Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin J Pain. 2012 Jun;28(5):418–427. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318236c8ca

Table 3.

Mixed model trend analysis of stimulus response and pain report measures.

Model Devianceb P (change)c P (approximate)d β 1 β 2
SEP
 Fulla 75228.28 - - - -
 Linear 75269.13 < 0.001 <0.001 −1.40*** -
Quadratice 75229.26 < 0.001 0.322 −3.89*** 0.860***
PDR
 Fulla 13139.28 - - - -
Linear 13139.74 < 0.001 0.795 −0.018*** -
 Quadratic 13139.36 0.538 0.777 −0.027*** 0.0029
Worst Pain
 Fulla 1856.39 - - - -
 Linear 1903.21 < 0.001 <0.001 −.35*** -
Quadratic 1857.38 < 0.001 0.320 −1.04*** 0.23***
a

Task difficulty/complexity modeled as a categorical factor (equivalent to a cubic trend).

b

−2 times the log likelihood of maximum likelihood solution.

c

P-value for the null hypothesis that the fit of the higher-order model is not better than (i.e., that the deviance is equal to) that of the lower-order model.

d

P-value for the null hypothesis that the fit of the reduced model is as good as (i.e., that the deviance is equal to) that of the full model. Higher values are better.

e

Best fitting models are indicated in bold typeface.

***

Value of the coefficient is significant at p<0.001.