Table 2.
Performance metrics | Proposed method | Ferrari et. al. [10] | Kwok et. al [11] |
---|---|---|---|
FP excluding inaccurate images | 1.9 ± 2.52 | 1.94 ± 2.93 | 3.7 ± 6.67 |
FP including inaccurate images | 3.93 ± 9.51 | 5.71 ± 13.14 | 4.7 ± 15.47 |
FN excluding inaccurate images | 5.51 ± 5.38 | 5.68 ± 4.39 | 11.29 ± 7.58 |
FN including inaccurate images | 6.28 ± 11.72 | 10.23 ± 16.03 | 17.28 ± 18.27 |
Total mismatched pixel percentage excluding inaccurate images | 7.41 ± 5.48 | 7.62 ± 4.45 | 12.32 ± 5.34 |
Total mismatched pixel percentage including inaccurate images | 10.75 ± 14.20 | 15.94 ± 23.51 | 21.98 ± 26.97 |
Number of images with (FP and FN) <5% | 38 | 29 | 20 |
Number of images with (FP and FN) <10% | 60 | 58 | 39 |
Total mismatched pixel percentage <5% | 31 | 22 | 18 |
Total mismatched pixel <10% | 55 | 53 | 33 |
Hausdorff distance | 13.56 ± 14.04 | 29.27 ± 32.16 | 35.18 ± 38.71 |
MDCP | 3.33 ± 4.16 | 8.17 ± 15.73 | 13.43 ± 16.41 |