Table 3.
Performance metrics | Proposed method | Ferrari et. al. [10] | Kwok et. al [11] |
---|---|---|---|
FP excluding inaccurate images | 5.42 ± 6.44 | 4.76 ± 5.87 | 3.54 ± 4.21 |
FP including inaccurate images | 18.81 ± 42.32 | 17.13 ± 39.03 | 5.76 ± 6.12 |
FN excluding inaccurate images | 5.08 ± 5.76 | 7.31 ± 9.97 | 3.19 ± 3.76 |
FN including inaccurate images | 5.12 ± 5.81 | 9.32 ± 10.61 | 32.62 ± 51.19 |
Total mismatched pixel percentage excluding inaccurate images | 10.5 ± 6.87 | 12.07 ± 8.43 | 6.95 ± 4.54 |
Total mismatched pixel percentage including inaccurate images | 23.38 ± 40.92 | 27.45 ± 37.99 | 38.38 ± 46.98 |
Number of images with (FP and FN) <5% | 9 | 7 | 4 |
Number of images with (FP and FN) <10% | 20 | 17 | 8 |
Total mismatched pixel percentage <5% | 7 | 6 | 3 |
Total mismatched pixel percentage <10% | 19 | 16 | 7 |
Hausdorff distance | 37.83 ± 62.82 | 39.43 ± 54.64 | 42.45 ± 61.12 |
MDCP | 10.41 ± 23.12 | 12.04 ± 21.89 | 19.35 ± 29.41 |