Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr 24;2012:169724. doi: 10.1100/2012/169724

Table 2.

Results of BLR analysis for SG succession.

Variable β S.E. (β) Sig. Exp (β) 95.0% C.I. for Exp(β)
Lower Upper
(a) During 1985~1998
DVSG-85 .022 .003 <.001 1.017 1.017 1.028
AGI8–98 −.016 .004 <.001 .976 .976 .993
DR85 −.115 .012 <.001 .891 .832 .945
ALT .122 .021 <.001 1.130 1.116 1.214
DS −0.109 0.23 <.001 0.890 0.877 0.913
*SLP
*ORI
*NDVI85
*DW
Intercept −1.912 .706 <.001 .148

(b) During 1998~2004
DVSG-98 .040 .003 <.001 1.041 1.036 1.046
AGI(9–04) .109 .002 .031 1.115 1.000 1.208
DR98 −.161 .021 <.001 .851 .800 .889
ALT .191 .019 <.001 1.210 1.112 1.277
*SLP
*ORI
*NDVI98
*DW
*DS
Intercept −14.411 .853 <.001 .000

Hosmer and Lemeshow Goodness-of-Fit Test: Chi-square =  1.802, Pr  >  Chi-square =  .213

n = 4000.

Maximum likelihood estimate of the parameter. S.E. (β): estimated standard error of the parameter estimate; Wald χ 2: Wald chi-squared statistic; Sig.: P value of the Wald chi-squared statistic; Exp(β): odd ratio.

*variables excluded by the logistic regression model after the run.

C.I.: confidence intervals.

The cut value is 500.