Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr 24;2012:169724. doi: 10.1100/2012/169724

Table 3.

Results of BLR analysis for LC succession.

Variable β S.E. (β) Sig. Exp (β) 95.0% C.I. for Exp(β)
Lower Upper
(a) LC succession: during 1985~1998
DVLC-85 0.040 0.003 <0.001 1.041 1.035 1.046
AGI(85–98) 0.013 0.005 0.005 1.013 1.004 1.022
DR85 −0.123 0.021 0.007 0.884 0.801 0.923
ALT 0.006 0.001 <0.001 1.006 1.005 1.008
DS −0.201 0.027 <0.001 0.818 0.779 0.900
*SLP
*ORI
*NDVI85
*DW
Intercept −13.830 1.015 <0.001 0.000

Hosmer and Lemeshow Goodness-of-Fit Test: Chi-square =  9.712, Pr  >  Chi-square =  0.286

(b) LC succession: during 1998~2004
DVLC-85 0.047 0.002 <0.001 1.048 1.043 1.052
AGI(98–04) 0.088 .019 <0.001 1.092 1.090 1.095
DR98 −0.098 0.011 <0.001 0.907 0.872 0.974
ALT 0.018 0.001 <0.001 1.018 1.008 1.010
*SLP
*ORI
*NDVI98
*DW
*DS
Intercept −15.420 0.783 <0.001 0.000

Hosmer and Lemeshow Goodness-of-Fit Test: Chi-square = 11.867, Pr  >  Chi-square = 0.157

n = 4000.

Maximum likelihood estimate of the parameter. S.E. (β): estimated standard error of the parameter estimate; Wald χ 2: Wald chi-squared statistic; Sig.: P value of the Wald chi-squared statistic; Exp (β): odd ratio.

*variables excluded by the logistic regression model after the run.

C.I.: confidence intervals.

The cut value is 500.