Table 2.
Grandson (N= 293) | Granddaughter (N=317) | Total (N=610) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||
N | % | N | % | N | % | |
SERVICE USE | ||||||
Community Services a | ||||||
Yes | 125 | 42.7 | 102 | 32.2 | 227 | 37.2 |
No | 168 | 57.3 | 215 | 67.8 | 383 | 62.8 |
School Services b | ||||||
Yes | 169 | 57.7 | 141 | 44.5 | 310 | 50.8 |
No | 124 | 42.5 | 176 | 55.4 | 300 | 49.2 |
Combined Use of Community and & School Services c | 109 | 37.2 | 77 | 24.3 | 186 | 30.5 |
Community Services Only | 16 | 5.5 | 25 | 7.9 | 41 | 6.7 |
School Services Only | 60 | 20.5 | 64 | 20.2 | 124 | 20.3 |
Neither Community nor School Services d | 108 | 36.9 | 151 | 47.6 | 259 | 42.5 |
| ||||||
NEED | ||||||
Community Services e | 147 | 50.2 | 127 | 40.1 | 274 | 44.9 |
School Services f | 183 | 62.5 | 152 | 47.9 | 335 | 54.9 |
| ||||||
UNMET NEED | ||||||
Community Services | 31 | 19.9 | 34 | 25.0 | 65 | 22.3 |
School Services | 26 | 13.3 | 29 | 17.1 | 55 | 15.1 |
Significant X2 results for Grandson x Granddaughter Cross-tabulations:
X2 (1) = 7.1, p < .01;
X2 (1) = 10.6, p < .01;
X2 (1) = 11.9, p < .01;
X2 (1) = 7.2, p < .01;
X2 (1) = 6.2, p < .01;
X2 (1) = 12.9, p < .01.