Skip to main content
. 2012 May 10;6:68. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2012.00068

Table 4.

Hierarchical regression analysis of alternative explanations of relatively higher RA among older adults in instructed gambling including EV-selection ability and probability-based selection bias.

β SE t adj R2 ΔR2
STEP 1
Baseline (uninstructed) RA 0.26 0.11 2.46* 0.07
STEP 2
EV-computation ability (EV-training block accuracy) 0.53 0.09 5.82** 0.32 0.25**
STEP 3
Probability-based selection bias (EQ high-probability choice) 0.35 0.08 4.11** 0.43 0.11**
STEP 4
Age 0.86 0.15 5.73** 0.59 0.16**

*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.

The dependent variable is the proportion of RA choices on conflict trials in instructed gambling across both age groups. All proportion data is logit-transformed then standardized. Age is dummy coded (−1/1 for younger/older adults).