Table 2.
Heuristic assumptions | Error of fitted values |
Error of fitted values – cross-validated |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Metric | Value | Metric | Value | |
No heuristic | Mx-S | 0.432 (0.450) | Pr-C | 0.502 (0.518) |
No alternates | Mx-S | 0.507 | ||
Pr-I | 0.513 | |||
Free heuristic – impervious | Mx-S | 0.387 (0.413) | Pr-C | 0.478 (0.495)† |
No alternates | Pr-S | 0.493 | ||
Free heuristic – vulnerable | Mx-S | 0.377 (0.402)* | Pr-C | 0.467 (0.483)* |
No alternates | Nno alternates | |||
Obligatory heuristic – impervious | Mx-S | 6.287 (6.451) | Mx-T | 6.267 (6.431) |
All other metrics were within 95% CI | All other metrics were within 95% CI | |||
Obligatory heuristic – vulnerable | Pr-I | 0.793 (0.828) | Pr-I | 0.857 (0.894) |
Mx-S | 0.803 | No alternates | ||
Mx-C | 0.828 |
Numbers in parentheses represent the upper limits of the 95% confidence interval (CI). For each heuristic assumption, the complexity metric that provides the best fit is listed (unshaded) and other metrics that fell within the 95% CI of this metric are listed below (shaded).
*Indicates the best fit (lowest score) across all heuristic assumptions within a column.
†Indicates a measure that falls within the 95% CI of the lowest error measurement within the same column.