Skip to main content
. 2012 May 10;3:135. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00135

Table 3.

Percent of predictions within one-half point of actual score in routine and cross-validated analyses.

Heuristic assumptions Precision
Precision – cross-validated
Metric Value and probability Metric Value and probability
No heuristic Mx-S 83.0 (80.5) Mx-S 68.5 (65.6)
No alternates No alternates
Free heuristic – impervious Mx-S 84.0 (81.6) Mx-S 70.6 (67.6)*
No alternates Pr-S 68.3
Free heuristic – vulnerable Mx-S 84.7 (82.3)* Mx-S 70.0 (66.9)
No alternates Pr-C 69.0
Pr-S 68.3
Obligatory heuristic – impervious Pr-I, Sum-I 10.7 (8.6) Mx-S 10.2 (8.2)
More than half the other metrics fall within 95% CI All other metrics fall within 95% CI
Obligatory heuristic – vulnerable Mx-I 41.6 (38.4) Pr-I 41.4 (38.1)
Pr-I 40.9 Mx-C 39.6
Mx-S 40.9 Mx-S 38.5
Sum-I 40.2 Sum-I 38.5

Numbers in parentheses represent the lower limits of the 95% confidence interval (CI). For each heuristic assumption, the complexity metric that provides the best fit is listed (unshaded) and other metrics that fell within the 95% CI of this metric are listed below (shaded).

*Indicates the best fit across all heuristic assumptions.

Indicates that a measurement falls within the 95% CI of the highest score within a column.