Table 3.
Heuristic assumptions | Precision |
Precision – cross-validated |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Metric | Value and probability | Metric | Value and probability | |
No heuristic | Mx-S | 83.0 (80.5)† | Mx-S | 68.5 (65.6)† |
No alternates | No alternates | |||
Free heuristic – impervious | Mx-S | 84.0 (81.6)† | Mx-S | 70.6 (67.6)* |
No alternates | Pr-S | 68.3† | ||
Free heuristic – vulnerable | Mx-S | 84.7 (82.3)* | Mx-S | 70.0 (66.9)† |
No alternates | Pr-C | 69.0† | ||
Pr-S | 68.3† | |||
Obligatory heuristic – impervious | Pr-I, Sum-I | 10.7 (8.6) | Mx-S | 10.2 (8.2) |
More than half the other metrics fall within 95% CI | All other metrics fall within 95% CI | |||
Obligatory heuristic – vulnerable | Mx-I | 41.6 (38.4) | Pr-I | 41.4 (38.1) |
Pr-I | 40.9 | Mx-C | 39.6 | |
Mx-S | 40.9 | Mx-S | 38.5 | |
Sum-I | 40.2 | Sum-I | 38.5 |
Numbers in parentheses represent the lower limits of the 95% confidence interval (CI). For each heuristic assumption, the complexity metric that provides the best fit is listed (unshaded) and other metrics that fell within the 95% CI of this metric are listed below (shaded).
*Indicates the best fit across all heuristic assumptions.
†Indicates that a measurement falls within the 95% CI of the highest score within a column.