Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Womens Health Issues. 2012 May;22(3):e303–e310. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2012.03.001

Table 2.

Bivariate Associations between educational attainment, Diagnosed STI, and TGP mediators

Outcome < than HS
(n = 94)
n (%) or
Mean (SD)
HS
(n = 217)
n (%) or
Mean (SD)
Some
college
(n = 357)
n (%) or
Mean (SD)
College and
above
(n =180)
n (%) or
Mean (SD)
Chi
Square or
ANOVA
P-value
Laboratory-confirmed STI 26 (27.7) 50 (23.0) 56 (15.7) 12 (6.7) 27.26 < .001***
Sexual Division of Power
 Condom negotiation barriers 5.69 (2.82) 5.04 (2.81) 5.24 (2.00) 5.62 (3.08) 1.85 .137
 SE to ask partner to get STI test 13.10 (4.38) 14.91 (4.58) 14.82 (4.55) 15.04 (4.25) 4.62 .003**
 Relationship control 18.79 (2.32) 18.91 (2.03) 18.94 (1.89) 19.09(1.78) .477 .698
 Risky partner1 42 (44.7) 83 (38.2) 119 (54.8) 57 (31.7) 6.08 .108
Structure of Cathexis
 STI Knowledge 7.80 (1.42) 7.65 (1.44) 8.08 (1.28) 8.19 (1.14) 7.34 < .001***
 Have sex with older partners, generally 48 (51.1) 118 (54.4) 197 (55.2) 95 (52.8) 0.65 .885
 More than one sex partner2 66 (70.2) 131 (60.4) 217 (60.8) 94 (52.2) 8.72 .033*
*

P-value <.05

**

P-value <.01

***

P-value <.001

1

Past 6 months

2

Past 12 months