Table 4.
Position of Accepted Candidate | Number of Structures Generated | Spectral Processing Time (min.) | Generation Time (min.) | d13C HOSE (ppm) | stdd 13C (ppm) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Example 1 | 1 | 389 | 135 | < 1 | 2.76 | 3.30 |
Example 2 | 1 | 50 | Tabular | < 1 | 1.73 | 2.23 |
Example 3 | 1 | 9339 | 180 | 30 | 2.10 | 2.74 |
Example 4 | 1 | 388 | 180 | 6 | 2.20 | 3.05 |
Example 5 | 1 | 116 | 60 | < 1 | 1.44 | 2.52 |
Example 6 | 1 | 9872 | 240 | 8 | 1.02 | 1.91 |
Example 7 | 1 | 127 | 120 | < 1 | 0.84 | 1.07 |
Example 8 | 1 | 3224 | 120 | 60 | 1.82 | 2.08 |
Numerical data. In most cases, raw experimental NMR data files were submitted. For example 2, the processed data were submitted in the form of a table.