Skip to main content
. 2012 May 10;344:e2990. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e2990

Table 4.

 Relative risk of confirmed venous thrombosis in current users of different types of hormonal contraception according to length of use

Hormonal contraception No with confirmed venous thrombosis Adjusted relative risk (95% CI)*
<1 year 1-4 years >4 years
Non-use 1209 1 (reference) 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
COC with levonorgestrel and 30-40 µg oestrogen 144 4.25 (3.17 to 5.69) 3.07 (2.28 to 4.13) 2.71 (2.06 to 3.58)
COC with norgestimate 135 4.97 (3.86 to 6.39) 2.97 (2.19 to 4.03) 2.67 (1.82 to 3.92)
Patch 6 6.89 (2.22 to 21.4) 11.9 (3.82 to 36.9) NA
Vaginal ring 39 8.36 (5.73 to 12.2) 3.83 (1.91 to 7.69) 5.37 (1.73 to 16.7)
Implant 5 1.63 (0.41 to 6.52) 1.43 (0.46 to 4.45) NA
Levonorgestrel IUS 33 0.59 (0.34 to 1.05) 0.61 (0.39 to 0.94) NA

COC=combined oral contraceptive; patch=transdermal contraceptive patch (EVRA; Johnson & Johnson, NJ, USA); implant=subcutaneous implant (Implanon; MSD, NJ, USA); vaginal ring=combined hormonal vaginal ring (NuvaRing; MSD; NJ, USA); levonorgestrel IUS=levonorgestrel intrauterine system (Mirena; Bayer Pharma, Berlin, Germany); NA=not available.

*Adjusted for age, calendar year, and education.