Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Jan 13;35(6):1338–1348. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23577

Table 3.

Regressions with Microsphere Flow Ratio (MFR) and resulting goodness-of-fit criteria and power analysis

Ischemic Extent (IE)
Segment-Intensity Response (SIR)
End-Systole End-Diastole End-Systole End-Diastole
Linear
Equation§ IE= −0.65·MFR+3.49 IE= −0.45·MFR+2.6 SIR=0.03·MFR+0.87 SIR= −0.001·MFR+0.97
R2 0.72 0.73 0.51 ~0
P-value* <0.0001 <0.0002 <0.0036 0.91
 Powerp-value 0.79 0.61 0.73 #
 Powera=0.05 0.99 0.99 0.97 #
Exponential
Equation§ IE= 6.46e−0.58·MFR IE= 3.5e−0.4·MFR - || - ||
R2 0.81 0.74 - || - ||
P-value* <0.0001 <0.0005 - || - ||
 Powerp-value 0.98 0.67 - || - ||
 Powera=0.05 1 0.99 - || - ||
§

The resulting equation of regression between the variable IE or SIR and the Microsphere Flow Ratio (MFR).

*

p-value of the model F-statistic.

Post-hoc observed power for the R2 and p-value listed in the table.

Statistical power for R2 at the significance level of α=0.05.

#

Hypothesis rejected (P=0.91), therefore power cannot be estimated.

||

Regressions with exponential mono-decay functions for SIR are not reported (P>0.5).