Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 26;10:14. doi: 10.1186/1476-7120-10-14

Table 2.

Volumetric quantification of both ventricles by 2D-TTE, RT3D-TTE and CMR

2D-TTE CMR RT3D-TTE P value
* $ £

LV end-diastolic (mL) 126.6 ± 40.9 167.2 ± 65.3 143.9 ± 45.7 0.005 0.09 0.06

Mean difference (62.2 ± 37.9) (61.2 ± 46.2)

LV end-systolic (mL) 89.7 ± 38.4 108.0 ± 65.9 97.1 ± 46.6 0.0001 0.01 0.02

Mean difference (45.0 ± 31.6) (47.5 ± 32.9)

LV ejection fraction (%) 29.4 ± 0.8 35.3 ± 0.5 32.2 ± 0.4

RV end-diastolic (mL) 107.2 ± 30.5 135.2 ± 40.3 125.1 ± 35.4 0.0001 0.07 0.14

RV end-systolic (mL) 52.6 ± 17. 5 68.1 ± 25.8 64.7 ± 23. 6 0.0001 0.40 0.19

RV ejection fraction (%) 51. 4 ± 40.6 49.6 ± 35.2 48.8 ± 30. 9

*: P value between 2D-TTE and CMR

$: P value between 2D-TTE and RT3D-TTE

£: P value between RT3D-TTE and CMR