Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 9.
Published in final edited form as: Structure. 2012 Apr 12;20(5):814–825. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2012.03.007

Table 1.

Crystallographic refinement statistics and model geometry.

Model 3P9D + 3P9E (Dekker et al.) XL-MS (Refmac, NCS, no TLS) XL-MS (Refmac, NCS, TLS)
resolution limits 30 – 3.8 30 – 3.8 30 – 3.8
Rwork / Rfree 0.3178 / 0.3513 0.2696 / 0.3279 0.2568 / 0.3046
Figure of merit 0.672 0.715 0.751
number of atoms
Protein 110444 119056 119056
Ligand/ion 784 1024 1024
Water 7 0 0
average B factors
Protein (Å2) 141 125 139
Ligand / ion (Å2) 130 103 123
Water (Å2) 43 - -
r.m.s. deviations
bonds (Å) 0.012 0.007 0.007
angles (°) 0.986 1.052 1.068
Ramachandran plot
% preferred (Coot) 85.8 % 89.5 % 90.1 %
% outliers (Coot) 4.68 % 3.16% 2.89 %
number non-Proline cis peptides 184 0 0

In order to allow a fair comparison with the original model (Dekker; PDB codes 3P9E/3P9D), the XL-MS model was also refined without TLS B-factor parameterization (middle column). The statistics for the Dekker model were determined using Refmac using the default values from CCP4i.