Table 6.
Performance of random forest classifier using Model 2, direct sub-class classification approach
| Class label | Instances | True positive | Precision (%) | Recall (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1 | 192 | 157 | 83.51 | 81.77 |
| 1.10 | 88 | 87 | 93.55 | 98.86 |
| 1.16 | 74 | 65 | 89.04 | 87.84 |
| 1.2 | 179 | 169 | 88.02 | 94.41 |
| 1.3 | 176 | 162 | 94.74 | 92.05 |
| 1.4 | 175 | 162 | 94.74 | 92.57 |
| 1.5 | 97 | 78 | 81.25 | 80.41 |
| 2.1 | 96 | 80 | 95.24 | 83.33 |
| 2.2 | 91 | 90 | 70.87 | 98.9 |
| 2.3 | 80 | 39 | 60.94 | 48.75 |
| 2.4 | 98 | 83 | 91.21 | 84.69 |
| 2.5 | 97 | 86 | 88.66 | 88.66 |
| 2.6 | 96 | 82 | 82.83 | 85.42 |
| 2.7 | 110 | 68 | 93.15 | 61.82 |
| 2.8 | 93 | 74 | 94.87 | 79.57 |
| 3.1 | 87 | 71 | 77.17 | 81.61 |
| 3.11 | 36 | 33 | 80.49 | 91.67 |
| 3.2 | 89 | 85 | 86.73 | 95.51 |
| 3.3 | 87 | 76 | 87.36 | 87.36 |
| 3.4 | 95 | 86 | 94.51 | 90.53 |
| 3.5 | 91 | 85 | 91.4 | 93.41 |
| 3.6 | 92 | 88 | 92.63 | 95.65 |
| 3.7 | 55 | 43 | 91.49 | 78.18 |
| 3.8 | 36 | 31 | 79.49 | 86.11 |
| 4.1 | 172 | 159 | 90.34 | 92.44 |
| 4.2 | 185 | 147 | 89.63 | 79.46 |
| 4.3 | 183 | 180 | 91.84 | 98.36 |
| 4.4 | 91 | 77 | 91.67 | 84.62 |
| 4.6 | 97 | 85 | 91.4 | 87.63 |
| 4.99 | 93 | 87 | 92.55 | 93.55 |
| 5.1 | 179 | 168 | 85.28 | 93.85 |
| 5.2 | 96 | 86 | 83.5 | 89.58 |
| 5.3 | 188 | 154 | 84.15 | 81.91 |
| 5.4 | 98 | 77 | 92.77 | 78.57 |
| 5.5 | 99 | 84 | 85.71 | 84.85 |
| 6.1 | 418 | 416 | 93.91 | 99.52 |
| 6.2 | 183 | 156 | 81.68 | 85.25 |
| 6.3 | 170 | 151 | 87.79 | 88.82 |
| 6.4 | 82 | 70 | 80.46 | 85.37 |
| Overall | 4748 | 4190 | 87.35 | 86.74 |