Skip to main content
. 2012 May 2;18:1123–1146.

Table 2. Comparison of transcript abundance changes obtained by two methods*.

Gene Fold-method I* Gene Fold-method I* Gene Fold-method II* Gene Fold-method II*
Crybb2
19.8
Tmem40
2.4
Rnu73a
93.3
Pdlim1
3.7
Cryba1
19.4
Crygc
2.4
Lim2
75.7
Trim16
3.7
Cryba4
18.3
Acta2
2.3
Wnt7a
47.9
Lenep
3.6
Crygs
18.2
Igfbp7
2.3
Pitx3
40.1
S100a6
3.6
Cryaa
17.9
Lyz2
2.3
Tmem40
38
Cd44
3.6
Lim2
17.6
Vit
2.3
Mip
36
Gpd1
3.5
Mip
16.7
Tmem27
2.2
Wnt7b
26.1
Cbr2
3.4
Cryba2
16.4
Gsn
2.2
Gja3
23.8
Nanos2
3.4
Crybb1
15.1
C1qtnf5
2.2
Grifin
23.7
Gpnmb
3.4
Bfsp2
10.7
Mfrp
2.2
Cryba4
23.1
Gsta3
3.4
Lgsn
10.1
Igfbp7
2.1
Bfsp2
21
Ugt1a5
3.3
Grifin
9.8
Ucp2
2.1
Crybb2
20.3
Ugt1a10
3.3
Crybb3
9.2
Rspo1
2.1
Crybb1
20.2
Ugt1a1
3.3
Crybb3
8.9
Crygc
2.1
Crygs
20
Ugt1a9
3.3
Dct
7.2
Wnt7a
2.1
Cryba1
19.8
Ugt1a2
3.3
Cd24a
6.7
Trpm1
2.1
Cryaa
18.9
Bmper
3.3
Bfsp1
6.6
Npff
2.1
Cryba2
18.5
Ugt1a7c
3.3
Lctl
6.6
Krt15
2.1
Tyr
18.5
Ugt1a6a
3.2
Cryab
6.6
Selenbp1
2.1
Crybb3
16.3
1700093K21Ri
3.2
S100a4
4.9
Tspan10
2
Lctl
14.5
1110017D15Ri
3.1
Ttr
4.8
Mgst1
2
Cd24a
10.7
Ugt1a6b
3.1
Mlana
4.8
Tmem176a
2
Mlana
10.7
Cox8b
3.1
Gja3
4.6
Papss2
2
Dct
9.8
Acta2
3.1
Crygb
4.5
Mlph
2
Krt5
9.2
Pla2g2f
3
Rgr
4.2
Gsta3
2
Sfrp1
7.8
Ahnak
3
Crygd
3.9
Gsto1
2
Lrat
6.8
Lix1
2.9
Pmel
3.9
Perp
2
S100a4
6.4
Adamts4
2.8
Sfrp1
3.9
Srd5a2
2
Ttr
6.4
Ela1
2.7
Egr1
3.6
Psca
2
Mlph
6.3
Angptl4
2.7
Tyrp1
3.3
C1qtnf5
2
Rgr
5.7
Galr2
2.6
Aldh3a1
3.3
Mfrp
2
Tgm1
5.6
Dock5
2.6
Fabp5
3.2
Lgals1
1.9
Rpe65
5.5
Scel
2.6
Lenep
3.2
Islr
1.9
Emp1
5.3
Ppfibp2
2.6
Gpnmb
3.2
Penk
1.9
Srd5a2
5.2
Pld5
2.6
Gja8
3.2
Oca2
1.9
Slc6a20a
5.2
Thbs1
2.5
Serpina3n
3.1
Aldh3a1
1.9
Fam46c
5
Selenbp1
2.5
Wnt7b 2.9 Ak1 1.9 D21Rik 4.8 Ucp2 2.5

*The work-flow, Method I (BWA-ANOVA) and Method II (ELAND-SAM) are described in the Methods’ section. The numbers indicate fold changes between diabetic and nondiabetic controls as determined by two different algorithms.