Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr 17;17(1):7. doi: 10.1186/2047-783X-17-7

Table 2.

Patients treated with caspofungin

Type of use Monotherapy
(N = 36)
Combination therapy
(N = 6)
Total
(N = 42)
Caspofungin first-line therapy* 10 (28%) 1 (17%) 11 (26%)

Caspofungin second-line therapy** 26 (72%) 5 (83%) 31 (74%)
Thereof reason for switching to caspofungin
 Clinically refractory to first-line therapy 21 (58%) 5 (83%) 26 (62%)
 Toxicity with first-line therapy 2 (6%) 0 2 (5%)
 Other** 3 (8%) 0 3 (7%)

*The reason for using caspofungin as the first line therapy was "probable aspergillosis" in 10 patients and "proven aspergillosis" in 1 patient.

**In 25 patients, this consisted of azoles (9 posaconazole, 7 voriconazole, 6 fluconazole (of these, 5 for prophylactic use and 1 for unknown reasons), 3 itraconazole), in 5 patients polyenes (2 amphotericin colloidal dispersion, 3 liposomal amphotericin B), and in 1 patient other antimycotics. Prior antimycotic therapy had been given for a mean duration of 13.2 days.

**Breakthrough infection during azole prophylaxis