Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun;53(6):1190–1199. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M019570

TABLE 3.

Effects of torcetrapib on TRL apoB-48 kinetic parameters

Torcetrapib Alone
Atorvastatin + Torcetrapib
Parameter and Study Phasea 120 mg once daily (n = 9) 120 mg twice daily (n = 6) 120 mg once daily (n = 9) P, Statin vs Nonstatinb
ApoB-48 PS (mg)
 Placebo 18.5 ± 4.1 21.3 ± 5.8 7.4 ± 1.7 0.03
 Torcetrapib 9.0 ± 2.9 14.8 ± 4.5 6.3 ± 1.6 0.64
 Change (%) −49 ± 9 −30 ± 6 −3 ± 14
P value 0.007 0.01 0.47
ApoB-48 FCR (pools/day)
 Placebo 6.8 ± 0.8 7.0 ± 1.0 7.7 ± 1.0 0.55
 Torcetrapib 7.1 ± 0.9 7.1 ± 1.6 7.1 ± 1.2 0.87
 Change (%) 14 ± 17 4 ± 19 −5 ± 12
P value 0.83 0.82 0.37
ApoB-48 PR (mg/kg/day)
 Placebo 1.42 ± 0.30 1.60 ± 0.36 0.57 ± 0.13 0.04
 Torcetrapib 0.69 ± 0.21 1.07 ± 0.25 0.46 ± 0.09 0.59
 Change (%) −49 ± 8 −27 ± 17 −12 ± 12
P value 0.005 0.13 0.20

FCR, fractional catabolic rate; PR, production rate; PS, pool size; TRL, triglyceride-rich lipoprotein. Boldface indicates significance.

a

Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Significance for comparison of absolute values with placebo phase was determined using a paired t-test on log-transformed data.

b

Significance for comparison between torcetrapib alone and atorvastatin+torcetrapib cohorts on placebo and torcetrapib 120 mg once daily was tested by a two-independent sample t-test.