Skip to main content
. 2010 Feb 26;15(2):59–65. doi: 10.1186/2047-783X-15-2-59

Table 2.

Results of Thrombelastometry (ROTEM®) and impedance aggregometry (Multiplate®) before and after competition

Marathon Triathlon Cycling p(ANOVA)
ROTEM® Whole blood coagulation results
CT INTEM before (s) 172 ± 15.3 168.1 ± 12.9 164.7 ± 17.7 0.3956
CT INTEM after (s) 155 ± 18.3 # 154.2 ± 11.3 # 152.5 ± 13.0 # 0.9255
MCF INTEM before (mm) 58.1 ± 3.9 56.1 ± 3.2 59.3 ± 5.0 0.0823
MCF INTEM after (mm) 62.4 ± 3.8 # 59.5 ± 3.1 # 64.2 ± 4.2 # 0.0013 *
MCF FIBTEM before (mm) 10.9 ± 2.7 8.9 ± 2.8 9.6 ± 3 0.0928
MCF FIBTEM after (mm) 12.5 ± 3 # 9.9 ± 2.4 # 11.3 ± 2.4 # 0.0136 *
Multiplate® impedance aggregometry results
AUC TRAP activation before (g/l) 899 ± 149 911 ± 233 970 ± 186 0.4672
AUC TRAP activation after (g/l) 1041 ± 209 # 1009 ± 315 906 ± 288 0.3492
AUC ADP activation before (g/l) 529 ± 174 508 ± 178 589 ± 160 0.1281
AUC ADP activation after (g/l) 795 ± 258 # 800 ± 320 # 627 ± 219 0.0865

Data are displayed as mean ± standard deviation. (p < 0.05) Note, that results, obtained by thrombelastometry, show a significant increase of clot stability and shortening of coagulation times, while platelet aggregation is increased only in MAR and TRI after ADP activation, respectively in MAR after TRAP activation, but not in CYC. (* mark significant differences between groups, # mark significant differences as compared to baseline values)