Table 4.

Studies comparing open and arthroscopic Bankart procedure

Study	Year	Design	Artroscopic technique	Total number open/arthroscopic	Follow-up open/arthroscopic	Recurrence open/arthroscopic
Steinbeck et al.	1998 [40]	prospective	transglenoid suture	32/30	40/36 months	6%/17%
Sisto et al.	1998 [37]	retrospective	Suretac	7/23	47/47 months	0%/13%
Kartus et al.	1998 [21]	retrospective	Suretac	18/18	31/28 months	0%/0%
Jorgensen et al.	1999 [17]	prospective	transglenoid suture	20/21	36/36 months	0%/5%
Kim et al.	2002 [22]	retrospective	suture anchors	30/59	39/39 months	6.7%/3.4%
Fabbriciani et al.	2004 [9]	prospective randomized	suture anchors	30/30	24/24 months	0%/0%
Tjoumakaris et al.	2006 [42]	retrospective	suture anchors	24/69	42/42 months	4%/1%
Bottoni et al.	2006 [4]	prospective randomized	suture anchors	29/32	32/32 months	7%/3%
Including subluxations
Jorgensen et al.	1998 [17]	prospective	transglenoid suture	20/21	36/36 months	10%/10%
Cole et al.	2000 [6]	prospective	Suretac	20/37	54/54 months	9%/16% 18%/24% (incl. positive apprehension test)
Sperber et al.	2001 [38]	prospective randomized	Suretac	26/30	24/24 months	12%/23%
Karlsson et al.	2001 [20]	prospective	Suretac	40/60	36/28 months	10%/15%