Table 2.
Population and breeding system | N or Nm:Nf | Neb,demo | n | 10th | 50th | 90th | 10th | 50th | 90th | 10th | 50th | 90th |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noninbred | ||||||||||||
Monogamy | 10 | 10 | 10 | 4.84 | 11.99 | ∞ (23.2) | 4.10 | 8.27 | ∞ (10.3) | 5.39 | 9.42 | 27.01 (2.1) |
20 | 5.24 | 11.01 | ∞ (16.7) | 4.48 | 8.81 | 114.5 (8.5) | 5.90 | 9.57 | 24.42 (1.2) | |||
50 | 50 | 50 | 19.73 | 55.33 | ∞ (26.5) | 17.0 | 45.80 | ∞ (23.1) | 22.58 | 44.75 | 285.37 (6.3) | |
Polygyny | 5:20 | 13.79 | 20 | 7.63 | 16.18 | ∞ (14.4) | 6.11 | 12.42 | ∞ (12.0) | 8.80 | 13.81 | 38.51 (1.7) |
50 | 8.73 | 15.17 | 73.97 (5.8) | 7.06 | 13.57 | 85.49 (6.7) | 9.09 | 14.15 | 30.01 (0.5) | |||
20:80 | 53.78 | 100 | 25.28 | 59.03 | ∞ (17.6) | 21.62 | 50.24 | ∞ (18.2) | 28.10 | 52.03 | 203.54 (3.0) | |
Inbred | ||||||||||||
Monogamy | 10 | 10 | 10 | 4.46 | 12.18 | ∞ (26.5) | 3.43 | 6.70 | 38.20 (5.7) | 4.90 | 8.03 | 18.09 (0.9) |
20 | 4.81 | 10.99 | ∞ (22.8) | 3.51 | 6.60 | 22.29 (3.6) | 5.08 | 7.85 | 16.58 (0.3) | |||
50 | 50 | 50 | 17.50 | 50.37 | ∞ (23.4) | 11.58 | 20.30 | 85.59 (4.7) | 16.58 | 27.83 | 69.50 (1.0) | |
Polygyny | 5:20 | 13.79 | 20 | 7.52 | 16.19 | ∞ (17.6) | 5.00 | 9.31 | 41.06 (4.8) | 7.26 | 11.45 | 25.37 (0.6) |
50 | 8.47 | 15.85 | ∞ (10.0) | 5.31 | 8.85 | 21.79 (1.6) | 7.71 | 11.33 | 19.90 (0) | |||
20:80 | 53.78 | 100 | 23.61 | 57.84 | ∞ (19.7) | 15.01 | 24.62 | 73.89 (2.6) | 21.44 | 33.73 | 72.07 (0.4) |
Fifteen (L = 15) high-polymorphic marker loci were assumed.
N, the number of parents (half of each sex) in monogamy; Nm, the number of male parents; Nf, the number of female parents in polygyny; Neb,demo, effective number of breeders expected from demographic parameters; , estimated Neb from the heterozygote-excess method; , estimated Neb from equation (7); , harmonic mean of and .
Figures in parentheses are the percentage of replicates with .