Table 3.
Contribution | Neb,demo | Population | 10th | 50th | 90th | 10th | 50th | 90th | 10th | 50th | 90th |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.4, 0.3, 0.1, 0.1, 0.1 | 7.18 | Noninbred | 4.53 | 8.14 | 302.02 (9.3) | 3.59 | 6.91 | 18.55 (2.1) | 4.81 | 7.31 | 13.46 (0.2) |
Inbred | 4.07 | 8.30 | ∞ (16.9) | 2.69 | 5.45 | 14.09 (1.1) | 4.09 | 6.31 | 10.95 (0) | ||
0.6, 0.1, 0.1, 0.1, 0.1 | 5.03 | Noninbred | 3.80 | 6.82 | 107.07 (8.8) | 2.26 | 4.74 | 13.90 (2.0) | 3.40 | 5.42 | 9.94 (0.1) |
Inbred | 3.63 | 7.24 | ∞ (14.6) | 1.76 | 4.17 | 12.50 (1.6) | 2.96 | 5.02 | 8.90 (0.1) |
Fifteen (L = 15) high-polymorphic marker loci were assumed.
Contribution: expected contributions of =5 couples to sample.
Neb,demo, effective number of breeders expected from demographic parameters; , estimated Neb from the heterozygote-excess method; , estimated Neb from equation (7); , harmonic mean of and .
Figures in parentheses are the percentage of replicates with .