Table 2.
St21(60) | Pr22(62) | GH14M(6) | IC16M(3) | Sen27M(13) | CAR08(7) | Ben04M(41) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
St20(57) | ns/*/ns | ***/***/*** | ***/*/** | ***/*/ns | ***/**/** | ***/***/*** | ***/***/*** |
St21 | – | ***/***/*** | ***/*/** | ***/ns/ns | ***/***/*** | ***/**/*** | ***/***/*** |
Pr22 | – | – | ***/***/*** | ***/***/*** | ***/***/*** | ***/***/*** | ***/***/*** |
Three statistics are given χ2, a haplotype frequency-based statistic, KST*, a sequence-based statistic, and Snn. Levels of significance are coded as follows: ns, not significant; *0.01 < P < 0.05; **0.001 < P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. For each population, comparison the results are given as χ2/KST*/Snn. Populations are coded as in Table 1 and Fig. 2A. Numbers in parenthesis are sample sizes.
One-thousand permutations were made per test. Here, we perform 18 pair-wise comparisons, with 18 tests there is a 60.28% probability of finding a significant result by chance. Calculation of a strict Bonferroni adjustment without correlation, something we view as overly conservative in our situation, would require an alpha of 0.05, a P-value of 0.0027.