Skip to main content
. 2008 May;1(2):207–221. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2008.00028.x

Table 2.

Hierarchical FST analyses (AMOVA) by geographic region and ecotype.

Number of Variance component Fixation indices (and probability of H0)



Geographic region* Ecotype drainagesndrainage sitesnpop Within sites Among sites (within drainage) Among drainages Sites (FSC) Drainages (FCT)
Northern Sea/river-type 5 16 0.281 0.019 0.015 0.06 (<0.001) 0.05 (0.04)
Lake-type 5 23 0.233 0.070 0.046 0.23 (<0.001) 0.13 (<0.01)
Coastal Sea/river-type 4 7 0.247 0.105 0.054 0.30 (<0.001) 0.13 (0.33)
Lake-type 5 29 0.234 0.150 0.035 0.39 (<0.001) 0.08 (0.03)
Kokanee 4 11 0.124 0.148 0.091 0.55 (<0.001) 0.25 (0.06)
Southern Sea/river-type 2 4 0.326 −0.013 0.047 −0.04 (0.96) 0.13 (0.25)
Lake-type 3 15 0.228 0.035 0.039 0.13 (<0.001) 0.13 (<0.01)
Kokanee 3 13 0.263 0.074 −0.008 0.22 (<0.001) −0.02 (0.61)

Bold font indicates that the fixation index is statistically > 0.

*

Regions putatively colonized from different glacial refuges (Wood 1995, Wood et al. unpublished data).

Drainages are defined as in Table 1 except that the Fraser River drainage was divided between regions 1 (upper) and 2 (lower).

Samples refer to the individual populations in Supplementary Table 1.