Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 16;2(4):537–554. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2009.00092.x

Table 4.

Fit of alternative models with and without the putative outlier samples

Samples excluded n k r2 P value AICC ΔAICC
RudP, Ash, Gata, RudB, RudC 17 1 0.4768 <0.001 −108.49 0.00
RudP, Ash, Gata, RudB, RudC, Hem 16 1 0.5281 <0.001 −103.26 5.23
RudP, Ash, Gata, RudB, RudC, Hem, Amm 15 1 0.6292 <0.001 −99.37 9.12
RudP, Ash, Gata, RudB, RudC, Hem, Amm, WDar 14 1 0.6504 <0.001 −94.50 13.98
RudP, Ash, Gata, RudB 18 1 0.1353 0.064 −90.73 17.76
RudP, Ash, Gata, RudB, RudC, Hem, Amm, WDar, UChe 13 1 0.6459 <0.001 −87.68 20.81
RudP, Ash, Gata 19 1 0.0612 0.1099 −86.11 22.38
RudP, Ash 20 1 0.0880 0.066 −75.52 32.97
RudP 21 1 0.0589 0.076 −72.33 36.16
None 22 1 0.0335 0.142 −68.86 39.63

n refers to the number of samples and k the number of parameters.