Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 28;3(3):263–278. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2009.00111.x

Table 2.

Genetic diversity and neutrality tests for all sampling locations, including the number of individuals sampled (n), number of haplotypes observed at each location, haplotype diversity (h), nucleotide diversity (π), haplotype richness (HR); FIS, fixation index; AR, allelic richness; HE, expected heterozygosity; Fu's F, test for neutrality and DTaj, Tajima's D-test for neutrality; standard errors are in parentheses

n No. of haplotypes h π HR FIS HE AR Fu's F DTaj
Idaho 42 6 0.616 (0.012) 0.004 4.57 −0.01 0.58 5.46 (1.35) −0.92 −0.54
Missoula 49 6 0.450 (0.012) 0.002 4.00 0.12 0.58 5.52 (1.18) −1.90 −1.11
Glacier 48 7 0.457 (0.012) 0.002 4.12 0.01 0.58 5.69 (1.15) −3.25 −1.45
Alberta 21 2 0.324 (0.024) 0.002 1.98 0.02 0.63 6.36 (1.30) 1.94 0.38
Quebec 56 12 0.589 (0.010) 0.002 5.58 0.05 0.60 5.76 (1.38) −10.60** −1.87*
Oregon 32 3 0.462 (0.013) 0.003 2.47 0.08 0.58 5.13 (0.90) 1.54 0.64
S. Dakota 27 2 0.074 (0.013) 0.001 1.55 0.01 0.46 3.57 (0.52) −0.07 −1.51
All locations 275 18 0.613 (0.029) 0.003 0.05 0.60 6.03 (1.33) −11.46* −1.50
*

P < 0.05

**

P < 0.0001.