Skip to main content
. 2009 Aug;2(3):312–323. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2009.00078.x

Table 5.

Comparison of nutritional indicators between low vulnerability (LVF) and high vulnerability (HVF) largemouth bass presented as mean ± SE

Vulnerability

Parameter HVF n LVF n Test statistic P-value
Total protein (g L−1) 31 ± 0.8 12 30 ± 0.8 11 T = 0.72 0.48
Cholesterol (mmol L−1) 8.7 ± 0.3 12 8.4 ± 0.3 11 T = 0.77 0.45
Triglycerides (mmol L−1) 3.55 ± 0.33 12 3.15 ± 0.38 11 T = 0.80 0.44
Calcium (mmol L−1) 3.51 ± 0.18 12 3.33 ± 0.04 11 U = −0.37 0.71
Magnesium (mmol L−1) 1.83 ± 0.11 12 1.52 ± 0.05 11 U = −2.34 0.02*

Data were analyzed using a t-test (T) or a Mann-Whitney U test (U). As multiple comparisons were conducted, Bonferroni corrections were applied. The significance of values was based on the criterion α = 0.01. Significant values prior to Bonferroni corrections (α = 0.05) are indicated by an asterisk.