Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 4;4(6):736–748. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2011.00196.x

Table 1.

Mean fork length (cm; ±SE) and mass (g; ±SE) of the mature Atlantic salmon used in competitive breeding experiments comparing growth hormone transgenic and nontransgenic alternative reproductive phenotypes. In 2007, six trials compared age 0+ transgenic (T) versus 1+ nontransgenic (NT) parr and five trials compared 0+ transgenic versus 0+ nontransgenic parr; the size of parr involved are reported separately for each age comparison below. The N for each fish type is provided in parentheses

Length (cm) Mass (g)


Year Fish type Transgenic Nontransgenic Transgenic Nontransgenic
2006 Anadromous female 54.26 ± 1.20 (11) 1620.3 ± 150.8 (11)
Anadromous male* 65.45 ± 0.83 (11) 55.74 ± 1.61 (11) 2862.2 ± 134.2 (11) 1604.6 ± 180.1 (11)
Mature parr 14.39 ± 1.14 (30) 37.99 ± 3.18 (30)
Anadromous female 59.36 ± 1.83 (9) 1925.6 ± 140.4 (9)
Anadromous male 62.13 ± 1.49 (7) 2202.3 ± 287.5 (7)
2007 Mature parr (T 0+ vs NT 1+) 15.22 ± 0.56 (6) 14.14 ± 0.28 (6) 36.10 ± 3.52 (6) 30.9 ± 1.91 (6)
Mature parr* (T 0+ vs NT 0+) 9.33 ± 0.70 (5) 7.84 ± 0.39 (5) 20.6 ± 2.45 (5) 12.85 ± 1.40 (5)
*

Instances where transgenic males were larger than nontransgenic males in length and mass.