Table 1.
Aims and approaches/outcomes for developing evolutionary resilience in populations and landscapes against climate change
Aim | Scale where applied | Approach/Outcome | Comments/Limitations |
---|---|---|---|
A. Increase population size and genetic variation generally | Population | Increased census size | Needs to be related to effective size, which depends on life history and environmental variability |
Increased effective size | Can be enhanced by population connectedness and breeding systems | ||
Maintenance/increase in mtDNA/nuclear DNA variation (neutral) | Can be increased by including individuals from different populations (translocation) as well as through population size | ||
B. Maintain adaptive potential in target genes and traits | Population | Identification and maintenance of genetic variation in candidate genes for adaptation | Focus of candidate gene work is on model species, but increasingly being applied to nonmodel systems |
Identification/maintenance of variation in key quantitative traits (heritability/evolvability) | Potentially could be used to assess selection response potential but still fairly rarely measured | ||
C. Identify species with little adaptive potential = low diversity in key ecological traits | Multiple populations of one species | Measure and identify traits involved in maintaining distribution with low heritability/evolvability or other constraints limiting directional evolution | Requires substantial genetic information on target species unless ecological correlates can be identified |
D. Identify and protect evolutionary refugia | Multiple populations of multiple species within a landscape | Identify hotspots with high levels of mtDNA/nuclear DNA variation (neutral) | Depends on the accumulation of data across multiple species |
Identify mtDNA/nuclear DNA uniqueness across regions | Depends on the accumulation of data across multiple species, could be applied at higher taxonomic levels to preserve evolutionary uniqueness | ||
E. Increase connectedness and gene flow across environmental gradients | Multiple populations in a landscape | Movement of genes within landscape | Involves gene flow rather than just migration of individuals |
Allow in situ selection across heterogeneous areas and climatic gradients | Needs large populations to ensure effective selection of high fitness genotypes | ||
F. Increase adaptability to future environments by translocation | Population | Introduction of genetic material from provenances that match likely future climate at a site | Genotypes can be matched to likely future environments, but approach still rarely applied outside of deliberate introductions of species |