Table 1.

Colocalization coefficients

	Means ± SE (n)
ENaC vs. Rab11a	0.281 ± 0.070 (5)
*Rab11a vs. ENaC	0.213 ± 0.010 (5)
ENaC vs. Rab11b	0.516 ± 0.043 (5)
Rab11b vs. ENaC	0.296 ± 0.031 (5)
Rab11a vs. Rab11b	0.160 ± 0.020 (3)
Rab11b vs. Rab11a	0.228 ± 0.012 (3)

The proportion of colocalized immunofluorescent signal for labeled Rab11a, Rab11b, and epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) or Rab11a and Rab11b is presented as a mean of >3 different experiments (n). A significantly (*) greater proportion of ENaC signal was localized with Rab11b than Rab11a (P < 0.05).