Table 2.
Summary of the program implementers' perceptions towards the program.
| Respondents with positive responses (options 4–6) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | S2 | S3 | Overall | ||||||
| n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | ||
| (1) | The objectives of the curriculum were very clear | 3,865 | 94.45 | 2,437 | 94.02 | 1,149 | 93.72 | 7,451 | 94.06 |
| (2) | The design of the curriculum was very good | 3,416 | 83.52 | 2,144 | 82.94 | 1,031 | 84.09 | 6,591 | 83.52 |
| (3) | The activities were carefully planned | 3,634 | 88.87 | 2,289 | 88.48 | 1,076 | 87.98 | 6,999 | 88.44 |
| (4) | The classroom atmosphere was very pleasant | 3,564 | 87.40 | 2,182 | 84.38 | 1,009 | 82.77 | 6,755 | 84.85 |
| (5) | There was much peer interaction among the students | 3,516 | 86.18 | 2,174 | 84.20 | 1,009 | 83.18 | 6,699 | 84.52 |
| (6) | Students participated actively during lessons (including discussions, sharing, games, etc.) | 3,496 | 85.88 | 2,104 | 81.65 | 974 | 80.30 | 6,574 | 82.61 |
| (7) | The program had a strong and sound theoretical support | 3,496 | 86.02 | 2,180 | 84.86 | 1,043 | 86.06 | 6,719 | 85.65 |
| (8) | The teaching experience I encountered enhanced my interest in the course | 3,234 | 79.60 | 2,010 | 78.39 | 953 | 78.76 | 6,197 | 78.92 |
| (9) | Overall speaking, I have a very positive evaluation of the program | 3,222 | 78.99 | 2,033 | 78.71 | 948 | 78.15 | 6,203 | 78.62 |
| (10) | On the whole, students liked this curriculum very much | 3,236 | 79.57 | 1,969 | 76.67 | 920 | 75.85 | 6,125 | 77.36 |
Note: All items are on a 6-point Likert scale with 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = slightly disagree, 4 = slightly agree, 5 = agree, 6 = strongly agree. Only respondents with positive responses (options 4–6) are shown in the table.