Skip to main content
. 2012 May 16;7(5):e37398. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037398

Table 2. Estimated interaction coefficients from ANOVA of the 23 selected ISGs and corresponding P values.

Gene Symbol Estimate (%) P value Adjusted P value1
SAMD4A 2 −45.5333 0 0
IRF2 −44.0567 0 0
MDA5 −36.7333 0 0
RIG-I −36.2433 0 0
SSBP3 −32.2667 0 0
C5orf39 −29.8 0 0
PSMB9 −24.1333 0 0
MYD88 −23.7333 0 0
PHF11 −18.6333 0 1.00E−04
IRF7 −17.9667 0 2.00E−04
IFIT5 −17.5667 0 2.00E−04
IFITM3 −17.5333 0 2.00E−04
CXCL9 −16.4 1.00E−04 7.00E−04
BTN3A3 −11.8333 0.0031 0.023
UPP2 −11.2 0.0051 0.0355
SMAD3 −11.0333 0.0057 0.0374
MAB21L2 −10.1667 0.0107 0.0534
COMMD3 −9.4667 0.0172 0.0688
RASSF4 −9 0.0233 0.0932
SAMHD1 −5.9333 0.1318 0.2707
S100A8 −5.2667 0.1804 0.3609
FLJ3973 1.6 0.7386 0.7386
IL28RA 11.92 0.0029 0.023
1

The P values were adjusted using Hommel's adjustment for multiple comparisons.

2

Genes in bold font showed statistically significant synergy with ZAP (P<0.05).