Skip to main content
Medical Gas Research logoLink to Medical Gas Research
. 2011 Dec 6;1:28. doi: 10.1186/2045-9912-1-28

Property value estimation for inhaled therapeutic binary gas mixtures: He, Xe, N2O, and N2 with O2

Ira Katz 1,2,, Georges Caillibotte 1, Andrew R Martin 1, Philippe Arpentinier 3
PMCID: PMC3354644  PMID: 22146153

Abstract

Background

The property values of therapeutic gas mixtures are important in designing devices, defining delivery parameters, and in understanding the therapeutic effects. In the medical related literature the vast majority of articles related to gas mixtures report property values only for the pure substances or estimates based on concentration weighted averages. However, if the molecular size or structures of the component gases are very different a more accurate estimate should be considered.

Findings

In this paper estimates based on kinetic theory are provided of density, viscosity, mean free path, thermal conductivity, specific heat at constant pressure, and diffusivity over a range of concentrations of He-O2, Xe-O2, N2O-O2 and N2-O2 mixtures at room (or normal) and body temperature, 20 and 37°C, respectively and at atmospheric pressure.

Conclusions

Property value estimations have been provided for therapeutic gas mixtures and compared to experimental values obtained from the literature where possible.

Introduction

Inhaled therapeutic gases in use today include helium (He) for respiratory treatments, and xenon (Xe) and nitrous oxide (N2O) for anesthesia. For clinical applications these gases are used in the form of mixtures with oxygen in a range of concentrations (typically starting from 20% oxygen (O2) concentration by volume, which is equivalent to a mole fraction of 0.20) so as to maintain adequate oxygenation. Other gases, such as nitric oxide (NO) for pulmonary vascular dilation, are used only in trace amounts.

The property values of therapeutic gas mixtures are important in designing devices, defining delivery parameters, and in understanding the therapeutic effects. Properties of interest include density, viscosity, mean free path, thermal conductivity, specific heat, and diffusivity. In the medical literature the vast majority of articles related to gas mixtures report property values only for the pure substances or estimates based on (volume or molar) concentration weighted averages [1-7]. However, if the molecular size or structures of the component gases are very different a more accurate estimate could be considered [8-10]. For this reason property values of helium and xenon mixtures should be considered for more accurate estimation.

Starting with kinetic theory for molecules treated as hard spheres as a basis, a rich literature has developed regarding the modeling of property values based on first principles and increasing complexity of the molecular interactions; in particular, the attraction and repulsion of molecules as first formulated by Chapman and Enskog [8,9]. The empirically determined Lennard-Jones potential energy function has proved to be a good model for many applications. Extensive measurements of the viscosity of gases using oscillating-disk viscometry have primarily been published by Kestin and his colleagues [11-16]. Other equilibrium and transport properties have been extrapolated from the viscosity measurements using the models described above [8,9]. There also exists limited thermal conductivity data measured using a hot wire method [17].

The objective of this short communication is to give a straightforward reference to the applied scientist, engineer, and medical personnel who perform research with therapeutic gas mixtures. We anticipate that this information will assist both in the design and interpretation of experiments. Estimates of density, viscosity, mean free path, thermal conductivity, specific heat at constant pressure, and diffusivity are provided over a range of concentrations of He-O2, Xe-O2, and N2O-O2 mixtures at room (or normal) and body temperature, 20 and 37°C, respectively and at atmospheric pressure; based on kinetic theory and compared to experimental values obtained from the literature where it is possible. For further comparison N2-O2 mixtures will be included because this mixture makes up the composition of medical air.

Methods

Density

All of the mixtures can be evaluated as ideal gases under the conditions considered. As such the density is based on the state equation as,

ρmix=pRmixT (1)

where ρmix is the mixture density, p is the pressure, T is the absolute temperature and Rmix is the gas constant defined for the mixture as

Rmix=RunivXiMWi+(1-Xi)32 (2)

In Equation (2) Runiv is the universal gas constant, Xi is the mole fraction of the pure gas component, and MWi is the molecular weight of the pure gas component (32 is the molecular weight for oxygen). The units of Rmix depends on the value chosen for Runiv (e.g., 8314 N-m/kgmol-K).

Viscosity

For viscosity we use a semi-empirical method by Wilke [8] that extends the model for collisions between hard spheres to mixtures.

μmix=XiμiXi+(1-Xi)ϕi-O2+(1-Xi)μO2XiϕO2-i+(1-Xi) (3a)
ϕi-O2=1+μiμO232MWi14281+MWi32 (3b)
ϕO2-i=1+μO2μiMWi3214281+32MWi (3c)

μi and μO2are the viscosities of the pure gas component and oxygen, respectively. The pure gas viscosity estimates are based on the Lennard-Jones empirical function for the potential:

ϕ(r)=4εσr12-σr6 (4)

where r is the distance between the molecules, ε is a characteristic energy of the interaction between molecules and σ is a characteristic diameter, or collision diameter. Equation (5) is a viscosity formula based on the Lennard-Jones parameters in units of kg/s-m derived for monatomic gases that has also been shown to work well for polyatomic gases [8],

μi=0.26693x10-5MWiTσ2Ωμ (5)

where Ωμ is a function of ε. Lennard-Jones parameters are tabulated for common gases [8,9] and for the gases herein in Table 1.

Table 1.

Molecular parameters and Lennard-Jones potential parameters for the pure gas components [9].

Gas MW R (J/kg-K) σ (Å) ε/κ (°K) Ωμ
at 20°C
Ωμ
at 37°C
Atomic Diffusion Volume
(Σv)
He 4.003 2076.9 2.551 10.22 0.7061 0.7004 2.67

Xe 131.3 63.3 4.047 231. 1.4140 1.3798 32.7

N2O 44.02 188.9 3.828 232.4 1.4190 1.3846 35.9

N2 28.02 296.7 3.798 71.4 0.9697 0.9535 18.5

O2 32.00 259.8 3.467 106.7 1.0635 1.047 16.3

Values for Ω have been interpolated from Table B-2 in Bird et al. [8]. κ is the Boltzmann constant.

Mean Free Path

The estimation of mean free path is based on the Chapman-Enskog formulation for hard spheres [18], where the mixture viscosity and density account for the interactions of the different molecules:

λmix=16μmix5ρmix2πRmixT (6)

The input values are obtained from Equations 1-3.

Specific Heat at Constant Pressure

The specific heat at constant pressure (on a per unit mass basis) for all of the mixtures can be evaluated assuming ideal gas behavior and therefore the specific heat curve is a linear function of the mass fraction, though nonlinear in terms of the mole fraction

cpmix=Xiρiρmixcpi+1-XiρO2ρmixcpO2 (7)

where cpmix and cpi are the specific heats of the mixture and of the pure gas component, respectively. The pure gas values for the monatomic gases are based on the theoretical value cpi=2.5RunivMWi The polyatomic estimates are based on empirically derived 4th order polynomials in temperature found in Poling et al. [9].

Thermal Conductivity

Thermal conductivity is treated in an analogous manner to viscosity, where Equation (8a) is equivalent to Equation (3a) and the coefficients are exactly the same based on the pure gas viscosity values.

μmix=XikiXi+(1-Xi)ϕi-O2+(1-Xi)kO2XiϕO2-i+(1-Xi) (8a)
ϕi-O2=1+μiμO232MWi14281+MWi32 (8b)
ϕO2-i=1+μO2μiMWi3214281+32MWi (8c)

The pure gas conductivity estimates are based on a modified Eucken approximation found in Poling et al. [9].

ki=μiRicpiRi-11.15+2.03cpiRi-1 (9)

Diffusivity

The self diffusivity for a binary system Dij, represents the movement of species i relative to the mixture, where Dij = Dji. The presentation here is based on the method of Fuller et al. given in Poling et al [9], which uses empirically obtained atomic diffusion volumes (Σv).

DiO2=1.43x10-7T1.752p1MWi+132-12Σvi13+16.3132 (10)

In Equation (10) j always represents oxygen, the diffusivity is in m2/s, T is the temperature in degrees Kelvin, p is the pressure in bar and the atomic diffusion volumes are given in Table 1 for each gas. DiO2is almost independent of composition at low pressures so only a single value will be calculated for each binary gas pair [8].

Of much practical interest is the diffusivity of water vapor or carbon dioxide through the gas mixtures. Values are calculated for these mixtures based on Blanc's law [9].

Dmk=XjDjk+XO2DO2k-1 (11)

Where m represents the therapeutic gas mixture considered, j represents the specific therapeutic gas, and k corresponds to H2O or CO2. The diffusion constants in Equation 11 of H2O or CO2 through the therapeutic gas or oxygen are calculated using Equation 10 with atomic diffusion volumes of 13.1 and 26.9 for H2O or CO2, respectively.

Results

The molecular weights, gas constants, Lennard-Jones parameters, and atomic diffusion volumes for the pure gases are given in Table 1. The mixture results are given in tabular and graphical forms. Tables 2, 3, 4, and 5 give the property values for He, Xe, N2O, and N2 with O2 mixtures, as a function of mole fraction at 20°C. Tables 6, 7, 8, and 9 are the analogous tables for 37°C. Table 10 gives binary diffusivities for the gas mixtures. Figures 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 are plots of the 20°C data of density, viscosity, mean free path, thermal conductivity, and specific heat, respectively.

Table 2.

He-O2 property values at 20°C and 1 atm.

He Mole Fraction ρ (kg/m3) μ × 105 (kg/s-m) λ (n m) k (W/m-K) cp (J/kg-K) DH2O× 105 (m2/s) DCO2× 105 (m2/s)
0 1.330 2.029 70.561 0.026 917.5 2.551 1.573

0.05 1.272 2.040 72.547 0.029 945.5 2.641 1.632

0.10 1.214 2.051 74.673 0.032 976.1 2.739 1.695

0.15 1.156 2.063 76.954 0.035 1009.8 2.844 1.764

0.20 1.098 2.074 79.409 0.039 1047.1 2.957 1.838

0.25 1.039 2.086 82.057 0.043 1088.6 3.080 1.919

0.30 0.981 2.097 84.924 0.047 1135.0 3.214 2.007

0.35 0.923 2.109 88.038 0.051 1187.3 3.359 2.104

0.40 0.865 2.120 91.432 0.055 1246.6 3.519 2.210

0.45 0.807 2.131 95.148 0.060 1314.4 3.694 2.328

0.50 0.748 2.141 99.235 0.066 1392.8 3.888 2.459

0.55 0.690 2.149 103.751 0.071 1484.4 4.103 2.606

0.60 0.632 2.156 108.773 0.077 1592.9 4.343 2.772

0.65 0.574 2.161 114.393 0.084 1723.4 4.613 2.960

0.70 0.516 2.162 120.735 0.091 1883.3 4.919 3.175

0.75 0.457 2.158 127.959 0.099 2084.0 5.268 3.424

0.78 0.422 2.152 132.807 0.104 2230.9 5.503 3.593

0.79 0.411 2.150 134.522 0.106 2285.5 5.585 3.653

0.80 0.399 2.147 136.291 0.108 2343.2 5.671 3.715

0.85 0.341 2.127 146.059 0.117 2690.8 6.140 4.060

0.90 0.283 2.092 157.788 0.128 3181.5 6.694 4.477

0.95 0.225 2.037 172.409 0.139 3926.4 7.359 4.988

1.0 0.166 1.952 191.912 0.152 5192.4 8.169 5.632

Table 3.

Xe-O2 property values at 20°C and 1 atm.

Xe Mole Fraction ρ (kg/m3) μ × 105 (kg/s-m) λ (nm) k (W/m-K) cp (J/kg-K) DH2O× 105 (m2/s) DCO2× 105 (m2/s)
0 1.330 2.029 70.561 0.026 917.5 2.551 1.573

0.05 1.537 2.084 67.417 0.024 782.7 2.487 1.522

0.10 1.743 2.128 64.637 0.023 679.8 2.427 1.474

0.15 1.950 2.163 62.138 0.021 598.6 2.369 1.429

0.20 2.156 2.192 59.866 0.020 533.1 2.314 1.387

0.25 2.362 2.215 57.783 0.019 478.9 2.262 1.347

0.30 2.569 2.232 55.863 0.017 433.5 2.211 1.309

0.35 2.775 2.247 54.083 0.016 394.9 2.164 1.273

0.40 2.982 2.257 52.428 0.015 361.5 2.118 1.240

0.45 3.188 2.265 50.883 0.014 332.5 2.074 1.208

0.50 3.394 2.271 49.437 0.013 307.1 2.031 1.177

0.55 3.601 2.275 48.080 0.012 284.5 1.991 1.148

0.60 3.807 2.277 46.804 0.011 264.4 1.952 1.121

0.65 4.014 2.278 45.602 0.010 246.4 1.915 1.095

0.70 4.220 2.278 44.467 0.010 230.1 1.878 1.070

0.75 4.427 2.276 43.395 0.009 215.3 1.844 1.046

0.80 4.633 2.274 42.379 0.008 201.9 1.810 1.023

0.85 4.839 2.272 41.415 0.007 189.6 1.778 1.001

0.90 5.046 2.268 40.500 0.007 178.3 1.747 0.980

0.95 5.252 2.265 39.630 0.006 167.9 1.717 0.960

1.0 5.459 2.260 38.801 0.005 158.3 1.688 0.940

Table 4.

N2O-O2 property values at 20°C and 1 atm.

N2O Mole Fraction ρ (kg/m3) μx105 (kg/s-m) λ (nm) k (W/m-K) cp (J/kg-K) DH2O× 105 (m2/s) DCO2× 105 (m2/s)
0 1.330 2.029 70.561 0.026 917.5 2.551 1.573

0.05 1.355 1.956 67.394 0.025 914.3 2.500 1.542

0.10 1.380 1.892 64.577 0.025 911.1 2.451 1.511

0.15 1.405 1.835 62.065 0.024 908.1 2.404 1.482

0.20 1.430 1.784 59.820 0.024 905.2 2.358 1.454

0.25 1.455 1.739 57.810 0.023 902.4 2.315 1.426

0.30 1.480 1.699 56.005 0.023 899.7 2.273 1.400

0.35 1.505 1.664 54.383 0.022 897.1 2.232 1.375

0.40 1.530 1.632 52.923 0.022 894.6 2.193 1.351

0.45 1.555 1.605 51.605 0.021 892.1 2.156 1.327

0.50 1.580 1.580 50.414 0.021 889.7 2.119 1.305

0.55 1.605 1.559 49.337 0.020 887.4 2.084 1.283

0.60 1.630 1.540 48.361 0.020 885.2 2.050 1.262

0.65 1.655 1.523 47.475 0.019 883.0 2.017 1.241

0.70 1.680 1.508 46.670 0.019 880.9 1.985 1.221

0.75 1.705 1.496 45.938 0.019 878.9 1.954 1.202

0.80 1.730 1.485 45.271 0.018 876.9 1.924 1.184

0.85 1.755 1.475 44.663 0.018 875.0 1.895 1.166

0.90 1.780 1.467 44.108 0.018 873.1 1.866 1.148

0.95 1.805 1.461 43.601 0.017 871.3 1.839 1.131

1.0 1.830 1.455 43.137 0.017 869.6 1.812 1.115

Table 5.

N2-O2 property values at 20°C and 1 atm.

N2 Mole Fraction ρ (kg/m3) μ × 105 (kg/s-m) λ (nm) k (W/m-K) cp (J/kg-K) DH2O× 105 (m2/s) DCO2× 105 (m2/s)
0 1.330 2.029 70.561 0.026 917.5 2.551 1.573

0.05 1.322 2.015 70.289 0.026 922.8 2.548 1.573

0.10 1.314 2.001 70.016 0.026 928.2 2.546 1.573

0.15 1.306 1.987 69.743 0.026 933.7 2.543 1.573

0.20 1.297 1.973 69.468 0.026 939.3 2.541 1.573

0.25 1.289 1.959 69.192 0.026 944.9 2.538 1.573

0.30 1.281 1.945 68.915 0.026 950.6 2.536 1.573

0.35 1.272 1.931 68.637 0.026 956.3 2.533 1.573

0.40 1.264 1.916 68.358 0.026 962.2 2.531 1.574

0.45 1.256 1.902 68.077 0.026 968.1 2.529 1.574

0.50 1.248 1.888 67.796 0.026 974.1 2.526 1.574

0.55 1.239 1.874 67.513 0.026 980.2 2.524 1.574

0.60 1.231 1.860 67.230 0.026 986.3 2.521 1.574

0.65 1.223 1.846 66.945 0.026 992.6 2.519 1.574

0.70 1.215 1.832 66.659 0.026 998.9 2.516 1.574

0.75 1.206 1.818 66.371 0.026 1005.3 2.514 1.574

0.78 1.201 1.809 66.198 0.026 1009.2 2.513 1.574

0.79 1.200 1.806 66.141 0.026 1010.5 2.512 1.574

0.80 1.198 1.803 66.083 0.026 1011.8 2.512 1.574

0.85 1.190 1.789 65.793 0.026 1018.4 2.509 1.574

0.90 1.181 1.775 65.502 0.025 1025.1 2.507 1.574

0.95 1.173 1.761 65.210 0.025 1031.9 2.504 1.574

1.0 1.165 1.747 64.916 0.025 1038.7 2.502 1.574

Table 6.

He-O2 property values at 37°C and 1 atm.

He Mole Fraction ρ (kg/m3) μ × 105 (kg/s-m) λ (nm) k (W/m-K) cp (J/kg-K) DH2O× 105 (m2/s) DCO2× 105 (m2/s)
0 1.257 2.113 75.572 0.027 920.7 2.815 1.736

0.05 1.202 2.125 77.716 0.030 948.7 2.915 1.801

0.10 1.147 2.137 80.012 0.034 979.3 3.023 1.871

0.15 1.092 2.149 82.477 0.037 1013.0 3.139 1.947

0.20 1.037 2.162 85.131 0.041 1050.3 3.264 2.029

0.25 0.982 2.175 87.996 0.045 1091.7 3.400 2.118

0.30 0.927 2.188 91.101 0.049 1138.1 3.547 2.215

0.35 0.872 2.200 94.475 0.053 1190.3 3.708 2.322

0.40 0.817 2.213 98.157 0.058 1249.5 3.883 2.440

0.45 0.762 2.225 102.191 0.063 1317.3 4.077 2.570

0.50 0.707 2.236 106.633 0.069 1395.7 4.291 2.714

0.55 0.652 2.246 111.548 0.075 1487.2 4.528 2.876

0.60 0.597 2.255 117.019 0.081 1595.6 4.793 3.059

0.65 0.542 2.261 123.153 0.088 1726.0 5.091 3.266

0.70 0.487 2.264 130.085 0.096 1885.8 5.429 3.504

0.75 0.432 2.262 137.997 0.104 2086.3 5.814 3.779

0.78 0.399 2.258 143.316 0.110 2233.2 6.073 3.965

0.79 0.388 2.256 145.199 0.112 2287.7 6.165 4.032

0.80 0.377 2.254 147.142 0.114 2345.3 6.259 4.100

0.85 0.322 2.235 157.891 0.124 2692.7 6.777 4.481

0.90 0.267 2.202 170.832 0.135 3183.0 7.389 4.941

0.95 0.212 2.149 187.014 0.147 3927.4 8.122 5.505

1.0 0.157 2.064 208.666 0.161 5192.4 9.016 6.216

Table 7.

Xe-O2 property values at 37°C and 1 atm.

Xe Mole Fraction ρ (kg/m3) μ × 105 (kg/s-m) λ (nm) k (W/m-K) cp (J/kg-K) DH2O× 105 (m2/s) DCO2× 105 (m2/s)
0 1.257 2.113 75.572 0.027 920.7 2.815 1.736

0.05 1.453 2.173 72.306 0.025 785.3 2.745 1.680

0.10 1.648 2.221 69.409 0.024 682.0 2.678 1.627

0.15 1.843 2.261 66.798 0.022 600.5 2.615 1.577

0.20 2.038 2.293 64.418 0.021 534.7 2.554 1.530

0.25 2.233 2.319 62.231 0.020 480.3 2.496 1.486

0.30 2.428 2.339 60.210 0.018 434.7 2.441 1.445

0.35 2.623 2.356 58.334 0.017 395.9 2.388 1.405

0.40 2.818 2.369 56.586 0.016 362.4 2.337 1.368

0.45 3.013 2.378 54.951 0.015 333.3 2.289 1.333

0.50 3.208 2.386 53.419 0.014 307.7 2.242 1.299

0.55 3.404 2.391 51.980 0.013 285.1 2.197 1.267

0.60 3.599 2.395 50.625 0.012 264.9 2.154 1.237

0.65 3.794 2.397 49.346 0.011 246.7 2.113 1.208

0.70 3.989 2.397 48.138 0.010 230.4 2.073 1.180

0.75 4.184 2.397 46.995 0.009 215.6 2.035 1.154

0.80 4.379 2.396 45.911 0.008 202.1 1.998 1.129

0.85 4.574 2.393 44.882 0.008 189.7 1.962 1.105

0.90 4.769 2.391 43.904 0.007 178.4 1.928 1.081

0.95 4.964 2.387 42.973 0.006 168.0 1.895 1.059

1.0 5.159 2.384 42.086 0.006 158.3 1.863 1.038

Table 8.

N2O-O2 property values at 37°C and 1 atm.

N2O Mole Fraction ρ (kg/m3) μ × 105 (kg/s-m) λ (nm) k (W/m-K) cp (J/kg-K) DH2O× 105 (m2/s) DCO2× 105 (m2/s)
0 1.257 2.113 75.572 0.027 920.7 2.815 1.736

0.05 1.281 2.039 72.254 0.027 918.4 2.759 1.701

0.10 1.305 1.974 69.300 0.026 916.2 2.705 1.668

0.15 1.328 1.916 66.666 0.025 914.0 2.653 1.635

0.20 1.352 1.864 64.312 0.025 911.9 2.603 1.604

0.25 1.376 1.819 62.203 0.024 909.9 2.555 1.574

0.30 1.399 1.779 60.311 0.024 908.0 2.509 1.546

0.35 1.423 1.743 58.611 0.023 906.1 2.464 1.518

0.40 1.446 1.712 57.080 0.023 904.3 2.421 1.491

0.45 1.470 1.684 55.700 0.022 902.5 2.379 1.465

0.50 1.494 1.659 54.454 0.022 900.8 2.339 1.440

0.55 1.517 1.638 53.327 0.021 899.1 2.300 1.416

0.60 1.541 1.619 52.307 0.021 897.5 2.262 1.393

0.65 1.564 1.602 51.382 0.021 896.0 2.226 1.370

0.70 1.588 1.588 50.543 0.020 894.5 2.190 1.348

0.75 1.612 1.576 49.780 0.020 893.0 2.156 1.327

0.80 1.635 1.565 49.087 0.020 891.6 2.123 1.306

0.85 1.659 1.556 48.455 0.019 890.2 2.091 1.286

0.90 1.683 1.549 47.880 0.019 888.9 2.060 1.267

0.95 1.706 1.542 47.355 0.019 887.6 2.030 1.248

1.0 1.730 1.537 46.876 0.018 886.3 2.000 1.230

Table 9.

N2-O2 property values at 37°C and 1 atm.

N2 Mole Fraction ρ (kg/m3) μ × 105 (kg/s-m) λ (nm) k (W/m-K) cp (J/kg-K) DH2O× 105 (m2/s) DCO2× 105 (m2/s)
0 1.257 2.113 75.572 0.027 920.7 2.815 1.736

0.05 1.250 2.098 75.262 0.027 925.9 2.812 1.736

0.10 1.242 2.083 74.950 0.027 931.2 2.810 1.736

0.15 1.234 2.067 74.638 0.027 936.6 2.807 1.736

0.20 1.226 2.052 74.324 0.027 942.0 2.804 1.737

0.25 1.218 2.037 74.010 0.027 947.5 2.802 1.737

0.30 1.211 2.022 73.694 0.027 953.1 2.799 1.737

0.35 1.203 2.006 73.377 0.027 958.7 2.796 1.737

0.40 1.195 1.991 73.059 0.027 964.4 2.793 1.737

0.45 1.187 1.976 72.740 0.027 970.2 2.791 1.737

0.50 1.179 1.961 72.420 0.027 976.1 2.788 1.737

0.55 1.171 1.946 72.098 0.027 982.0 2.785 1.737

0.60 1.164 1.931 71.776 0.027 988.0 2.783 1.737

0.65 1.156 1.915 71.452 0.027 994.1 2.780 1.737

0.70 1.148 1.900 71.127 0.027 1000.3 2.777 1.737

0.75 1.140 1.885 70.801 0.027 1006.6 2.775 1.737

0.78 1.135 1.876 70.605 0.027 1010.4 2.773 1.737

0.79 1.134 1.873 70.539 0.027 1011.6 2.773 1.737

0.80 1.132 1.870 70.474 0.027 1012.9 2.772 1.737

0.85 1.124 1.855 70.145 0.026 1019.4 2.769 1.737

0.90 1.117 1.840 69.815 0.026 1025.9 2.767 1.737

0.95 1.109 1.824 69.484 0.026 1032.5 2.764 1.737

1.0 1.101 1.809 69.152 0.026 1039.2 2.761 1.737

Table 10.

Binary diffusivities at 1 atm.

Gas DiO2× 105 (m2/s)
20°C 37°C

He-O2 7.142 7.883

Xe-O2 1.243 1.372

N2O-O2 1.415 1.561

N2-O2 1.999 2.206

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Density of gas mixtures at 20°C and 1 atm.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Viscosity of gas mixtures at 20°C and 1 atm.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Mean free path of gas mixtures at 20°C and 1 atm.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Thermal conductivity of gas mixtures at 20°C and 1 atm.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Specific heat of gas mixtures at 20°C and 1 atm.

Discussion

In this paper thermophysical property values have been presented for inhaled therapeutic binary gas mixtures. Pure substance values at 20°C and 37°C and mixing formulas based on kinetic theory were used to estimate the mixture values. The approach was to use relatively simple estimates for nonpolar gases [8]. That is, more complex intermolecular interactions that occur, for example, at high pressure, were not included.

Whereas many therapeutic gases (e.g.; CO and NO) are used at trace concentrations such that property values of the bulk mixture are essentially equivalent to those of air, mixtures considered herein have significantly different properties than air which change as a function of component concentration. Mechanical property values of density and viscosity are fundamental to the understanding of gas transport and airway resistance. The thermal properties of conductivity and capacity are necessary to accurately predict how gas treatments will affect the temperature and humidity of the respiratory tract. They also will influence the thermodynamic interaction of inhaled aerosols with the gas, and thus the deposition distribution which is particularly relevant for helium-oxygen mixtures. Diffusion is a key mode of gas transport deep in the lung potentially affecting exchange with the blood.

Bird et al. [8] note that the concept of the mean free path is applicable only if there are no long range forces associated with the hard sphere kinetic theory models. For this reason it is not typically an element of modern kinetic theory. Nevertheless, it is an important parameter in modeling the interaction of aerosols and gases [19], and thus for combination therapies involving aerosols and gas mixtures. In contrast to the scheme employed by Loeb [20], the estimation method employed here does not directly take into account the molecular collisions. However, Equation (6) for the mean free path does account for the collisions of different molecules through the mixture viscosity. As the utility of this parameter in aerosol mechanics is to estimate a reduced drag on small particles where their size is comparable to the mean free path, this approach would appear to be self consistent.

A comparison of estimated data based on Equation (3) to experimental data for the viscosity at 20°C of helium-oxygen mixtures [14] is shown in Figure 6, along with the linear curve representing the concentration weighted average. The maximum relative difference of 0.9% between the theory and experiment occurs at XHe = 0.82. For the concentration weighted average value the maximum relative error of 7.9% occurs at XHe = 0.67.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Viscosity of He-O2 mixtures using Equation (3), based on a weighted average of the molar fractions and from experimental measurements [14].

Figure 7 shows comparisons of experimental thermal conductivity values [17] for helium-oxygen and xenon-oxygen mixtures at 30°C compared to theoretical values calculated using Equation (8). The maximum relative differences between the theory and experiment are 4.2% at XHe = 0.68 and 4.7% at XXe = 0.27, respectively.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Thermal conductivity at 30°C for He-O2 and Xe-O2 mixtures using Equation (8), based on a weighted average of the molar fractions and from experimental measurements [17].

Table 11 shows a good agreement between experimental data for binary diffusivity of He-O2 and Xe-O2 [14,21] with theoretical data calculated using Equation (10). For the diffusivity of water vapor or carbon dioxide, the simplifying assumption leading to Blanc's law is for a trace component diffusing into a homogeneous, binary mixture. A quantitative definition of trace for the applicability of this assumption was not found. However, experiments testing diffusion of He, CO and SF6 through gas mixtures similar to alveolar gas (14% O2, 6% CO2 and 80% N2) did not show significant departures from values predicted on the basis of binary diffusion coefficient values weighted according to fractional concentrations [22] in agreement with Blanc's law. These experiments were performed with test gas concentrations varying from 0 to 10% suggesting Blanc's law would be appropriate for typical applications of the gases considered herein.

Table 11.

Comparison of experimental and theoretical binary diffusivities based on Equation (10).

Di-O2× 105 (m2/s)
T (K) Experimental Theoretical Percent Difference

He-O2

298 [14] 7.06 7.357 4.21

300 [21] 7.441 7.437 0.05

Xe-O2

280 [21] 1.147 1.128 1.68

290 [21] 1.220 1.202 1.50

300 [21] 1.295 1.279 1.25

310 [21] 1.371 1.357 1.03

320 [21] 1.449 1.438 0.76

In conclusion, the methods presented above allow accurate estimation of thermophysical property values for inhaled therapeutic binary gas mixtures, including He-O2, Xe-O2, and N2O-O2, over a range of concentrations.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

All of the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

IK determined the appropriate models, wrote the software to implement the models and drafted the manuscript.

GC provided assistance with determining the models, implementing the software and edited the manuscript.

AM provided assistance with determining the models, implementing the software and edited the manuscript.

PA provided experimental data from the literature and edited the manuscript.

Contributor Information

Ira Katz, Email: ira.katz@airliquide.com.

Georges Caillibotte, Email: georges.cailbotte@airliquide.com.

Andrew R Martin, Email: andrew-r.martin@airliquide.com.

Philippe Arpentinier, Email: philippe.arpentinier@airliquide.com.

Acknowledgements

We thank Paul Finlay for performing some of the calculations.

References

  1. Anderson M, Svartengren M, Bylin G, Philipson K, Camner P. Deposition in asthmatics of particles inhaled in air or helium-oxygen. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993;147:524–528. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/147.3.524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baumert J-H, Reyle-Hahn M, Hecker K, Tenbrinck R, Kuhien R, Rossaint R. Increased airway resistance during xenon anaesthesia in pigs is attributed to physical properties of the gas. Brit Anaesthesia. 2002;88:540–545. doi: 10.1093/bja/88.4.540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Darquenne C, Prisk GK. Aerosol deposition in the human respiratory tract breathing air and 80:20 heliox. J Aerosol Med. 2004;17:278–285. doi: 10.1089/jam.2004.17.278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Frazier MD, Cheifetz IM. The role of heliox in paediatric respiratory disease. Paediatric Respiratory Reviews. 2010;11:46–53. doi: 10.1016/j.prrv.2009.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hess DR, Fink JB, Venkataraman ST, Kim IK, Meyers TR, Tano BD. The history and physics of heliox. Respir Care. 2006;51:608–612. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Mihaescu M, Gutmark E, Murugappan S, Elluru R, Cohen A, Willging P. Modeling flow in a compromised pediatric airway breathing air and heliox. Laryngoscope. 2009;119:145–151. doi: 10.1002/lary.20015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Palange P, Valli G, Onorati P, Antonucci R, Paoletti P, Rosato A, Manfredi F, Serra P. Effect of heliox on lung dynamic hyperinflation, dyspnea, and exercise endurance capacity in COPD patients. J Appl Physiol. 2004;97:1637–1642. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01207.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bird GA, Stewart WE, Lightfoot EN. Transport Phenomena. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1960. [Google Scholar]
  9. Poling BE, Prausnitz JM, O'Connel JP. The Properties of Gases and Liquids. 5. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  10. Reid RC, Sherwood TK. The Properties of Gases and Liquides: Their Estimation and Correlation. 2. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1966. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bzowski J, Kestin J, Mason EA, Uribe FJ. Equilibrium and transport properties of gas mixtures at low density: Eleven polyatomic gases and five noble gases. J Phys Chem Ref Data. 1990;19:1179–1232. doi: 10.1063/1.555867. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hellemans JM, Kestin J, Ro ST. The viscosity of oxygen and of some of its mixtures with other gases. Physica. 1973;65(2):362–375. doi: 10.1016/0031-8914(73)90351-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hellemans JM, Kestin J, Ro ST. On the properties of multicomponent mixtures of monatomic gases. Physica. 1974;71(1):1–16. doi: 10.1016/0031-8914(74)90043-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kestin J, Khalifa HE, Ro ST, Wakeham WA. The viscosity and diffusion coefficients of eighteen binary gas systems. Physica. 1977;88A:242–260. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kestin J, Khalifa HE, Wakeham WA. The viscosity and diffusion coefficients of the binary mixtures of xenon with the other noble gases. Physica A: Statistical and Theoretical Physics. 1978;90(2):215–228. doi: 10.1016/0378-4371(78)90110-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kestin J, Knierim K, Mason EA, Najafi B, Ro ST, Waldman M. Equilibrium and transport properties of the noble gases and their mixtures at low density. J Phys Chem Ref Data. 1984;13:229–303. doi: 10.1063/1.555703. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Srivastava BN, Barua AK. The dilute gas thermal conductivity of the binary mixtures O2 - He, O2 - Ne, O2 - Kr and O2 - Xe is measured at 30 C and 45 C for various compositions by using the thick-wire variant of the hot-wire method. J Chem Phys. 1960;32:427–435. doi: 10.1063/1.1730711. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Bird GA. Definition of mean free path for real gases. Phys Fluids. 1983;26:3222–3223. doi: 10.1063/1.864095. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Issacs KK, Rosati JA, Martonen TB. In: Aerosols Handbook: Measurement, Dosimetry, and Health Effects. Ruzer LS, Harley NH, editor. CRC Press LLC; 2005. Mechanisms of particle deposition; pp. 73–97. [Google Scholar]
  20. Loeb LB. The Kinetic Theory of Gases. 3. New York: Dover Publications, Inc; 1961. [Google Scholar]
  21. Dunlop PJ, Bignelli CM. The temperature and concentration dependences of diffusion coefficients of the systems Ne-O2, K-O2, Xe-O2 and He-NO. Ber Bunsen-Ges. 1992;96:1847–1848. [Google Scholar]
  22. Worth H, Piper J. Diffusion of helium, carbon monoxide and sulfur hexafluoride in gas mixtures similar to alveolar gas. Respir Physiol. 1978;32:155–166. doi: 10.1016/0034-5687(78)90106-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Medical Gas Research are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES