Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Med. 2012 Mar 13;74(12):1952–1960. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.02.009

Table 3. A Summary of Logistic Regression Analysis: Odds Ratios for 16 Cohesion and Structural Equivalence Exposures Up To Distance Four (N=13,187).

Covariates Past Drinking Current Smoking
Age 1.20*** (0.03) 1.09*** (0.02)
Female 0.92 (0.05) 0.91 (0.07)
Ethnicity
 African American 0.64*** (0.06) 0.57*** (0.09)
 Asian 0.57*** (0.10) 0.72 (0.15)
 White 1.10 (0.10) 1.60*** (0.20)
 Other 1.07 (0.17) 1.15 (0.22)
Grade (GPA) 0.87*** (0.03) 0.73*** (0.03)
Parental Education 1.02 (0.03) 1.03 (0.03)
Public Assistance 0.81 (0.09) 1.11 (0.17)
Emotional State (CES-D) 1.04*** (0.00) 1.05*** (0.00)
Popularity (Indegree) 1.15*** (0.03) 1.06* (0.03)
Isolates 1.60** (0.28) 1.27 (0.29)
Accessibility 1.99*** (0.15) 1.58*** (0.11)
Prevalence 5.73*** (1.74) 6.42*** (2.46)
Cohesion Exposure (EC)
 Distance 1 1.57*** (0.07) 1.50*** (0.05)
 Distances ≤ 2 1.44*** (0.08) 1.40*** (0.08)
 Distances ≤ 3 1.17** (0.06) 1.09 (0.06)
 Distances ≤ 4 1.16** (0.06) 1.08 (0.06)
Structural Equiv. Exposure (ES)
 Distance 1 2.36*** (0.12) 1.99*** (0.06)
 Distances ≤ 2 2.30*** (0.19) 1.83*** (0.09)
 Distances ≤ 3 1.90*** (0.14) 1 59*** (0.07)
 Distances ≤ 4 1.88*** (0.14) 1 59*** (0.07)

Note: ( ) indicates standard deviation; for ethnicity, Hispanic/Latino was used for the reference category. The odds ratios for the control variables were based on using cohesion exposures at distance one. The table does not include cohesion and structural equivalence exposures in the same analysis/model.