Skip to main content
. 2012 May 17;2:409. doi: 10.1038/srep00409

Table 2. Comparisons of the δ15N of materials associated with native and palm forests. Differences in zooplankton δ15N were evaluated using paired comparisons (pooled by date; indicated with *) owing to their rapid turnover. All other parameters were compared using unpaired tests. Na represents the total number of measurements conducted. Nb (zooplankton only) denotes the number of temporal comparisons conducted. Sampling was evenly split between native and palm forest sites.

  Native forests Mean (± SE) Palm forests Mean (± SE) t (df) P Na; Nb
Soils 16.6 (± 0.9) 10.4 (± 1.1) 4.4 (16) <0.001 18
Tree leaves (T. argentea) 15.4 (± 1.3) 8.3 (± 2.3) 2.6 (12) 0.01 14
Intertidal clams (Macoma dispar) 11.0 (± 0.9) 5.9 (± 0.6) 4.6 (11) 0.01 13
Subtidal sponges (Spirastrella sp.) 11.0 (± 0.1) 10.4 (± 0.2) 2.4 (31) 0.02 46
Zooplankton* 11.3 (± 0.2) 10.9 (± 0.2) 3.0 (5) 0.03 46; 6