Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 18;2:30. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2011.00030

Table 2.

Seed size in mother plants and offspring performance for the common scenario of Case 1 where plant types are indistinguishable and for Case 2 with distinct plant types.

Variable Exp. Year Case 1 (disregarding plant types) Case 2 (distinguishing between plant types)
Plant-type P Plant-type W
280 ppm 440 ppm 600 ppm 280 ppm 440 ppm 600 ppm 280 ppm 440 ppm 600 ppm
MOTHER PLANTS
Seed size (mg) Pre-exp. 11.1 (0.8) 9.4 (0.5) 9.5 (0.3) 12.0 (0.9)a 10.1 (0.6)b 9.6 (0.4)b 9.6 (0.9)b 8.9 (0.4)b 9.5 (0.6)b
OFFSPRING
Seedling emergence (days after sowing) 2006 5.9 (0.2) 5.9 (0.1) 6.3 (0.6) 5.8 (0.3) 5.7 (0.4) 5.3 (0.2) 6.5 (0.2) 6.5 (0.6) 6.8 (0.8)
2007 10.3 (0.7) 11.5 (0.3) 10.8 (0.9) 9.5 (0.7) 11.0 (1.0) 10.0 (0.7) 12.3 (1.3) 11.7 (0.4) 11.3 (0.9)
Anthesis (days after sowing) 2006 71.0 (1.4) 73.2 (1.9) 73.1 (0.7) 68.9 (0.6) 70.1 (2.6) 71.3 (1.4) 72.8 (2.9) 75.1 (1.0) 74.2 (0.6)
2007 74.0 (0.8) 74.2 (1.4) 74.0 (0.3) 73.0 (1.6) 73.8 (1.4) 73.1 (0.6) 75.1 (0.3) 74.4 (1.4) 74.2 (0.5)
Shoot biomass (mg per individual) 2005 676 (49)a 554 (6)b 564 (8)b 756 (40) 644 (39) 664 (62) 585 (87) 484 (26) 484 (11)
2006 338 (17) 318 (46) 311 (22) 384 (6) 403 (41) 391 (28) 241 (32) 269 (25) 243 (23)
Number of fruits per individual plant 2005 3.94 (0.22)a 3.35 (0.13)b 3.33 (0.05)ab 4.50 (0.29) 3.28 (0.15) 2.92 (0.46) 3.44 (0.29) 3.40 (0.10) 3.67 (0.44)
2006 1.71 (0.12) 1.56 (0.24) 1.68 (0.16) 1.90 (0.10) 2.04 (0.27) 2.02 (0.23) 1.49 (0.15) 1.13 (0.09) 1.34 (0.05)
2007 3.89 (0.32) 3.98 (0.30) 4.08 (0.04) 3.53 (0.11) 3.92 (0.36) 3.72 (0.17) 4.67 (0.88) 4.02 (0.27) 4.43 (0.20)
Number of seeds per individual plant 2006 4.71 (0.26) 4.28 (0.70) 4.15 (0.42) 5.40 (0.28) 5.92 (0.71) 5.42 (0.34) 3.69 (0.54) 2.94 (0.14) 2.99 (0.31)
2007 9.07 (0.69) 9.03 (0.56) 9.40 (0.23) 8.89 (0.46) 10.58 (1.18) 9.80 (0.61) 9.42 (1.21) 8.24 (0.26) 9.60 (0.70)
Seed size (mg) 2007 14.8 (0.3) 13.8 (0.7) 14.7 (0.5) 16.2 (0.6) 15.1 (0.7) 17.0 (0.4) 12.4 (0.5) 13.1 (0.9) 13.2 (0.3)

Data presented are mean ± 1 SE of n = 3 model ecosystems. Non-identical letters (a, b) designate statistically significant differences (P = 0.05, Tukey–Kramer HSD) among maternal CO2 treatments (Case 1; shoot biomass, number of fruits per individual plant, 2005) or combinations of maternal CO2 and plant type (Case 2; seed size of mother plants).