Table 1.
Number | Author | N = | Bile leaks | Presentation | Management | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(1) | Agarwal et al. [12] | 86 | 14 (16%) | Bile cutaneous fistula 11; biloma 3 |
Spontaneous closure in 11; ERCP in 3 |
All leaks in conservative surgery group |
(2) | Puliga et al. [13] | 232 | 27 (11.6%) | — | — | 25.2% leaks in conservative; 2.8% in radical |
(3) | Unalp et al. [14] | 183 | 24 (13.1%) | 17 low output; 7 high output |
17 spontaneous closure; 7 ERCP |
All conservative surgery |
(4) | Silva et al. [15] | 30 | 7 (23.3%) | Bilio cutaneous fistula 7 | Drainage alone | 29 conservative; 1 radical |
(5) | Skroubis et al. [18] | 187 | 18 (10%) | 3 bilomas; 1 bile peritonitis, 14 biliary fistulas (1 bronchobiliary) |
13 drainage alone; 5 ERCP (including broncho biliary) |
All conservative surgery |