Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Oral Oncol. 2011 Dec 9;48(1):18–25. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2011.11.012

Table 1.

Criteria for assessing the methodological and statistical quality of the studies reviewed.

(A) Sample characteristics: Well characterized patient population with defined inclusion and exclusion criteria
(B) Sample Size: The sample size is adequate to assess outcomes or is appropriately justified
(C) Data collection: The process of data collection is described (e.g., interviews or self-report)
(D) Response rates: Participation and response rates are described and are above 75%
(E) Outcome measurement: Standardized measurement of psychological health outcomes
(F) Comparison groups: Results are compared between two groups or more (e.g., patients or health populations)
(G) Statistical analyses: The statistical analyses are adequately described, including levels of significance and/or confidence intervals when appropriate. A general
 determination of the extent to which all analyses that should have been done were done

Note: (Studies were assigned ‘1′ point for each criteria that they met, for a total possible score of 7).