Skip to main content
. 2010 Jul 22;39(8):585–599. doi: 10.1007/s13280-010-0082-8

Table 1.

Overview of experiments, consulted references, classification of results, and supplementary information

References consulted for experiment Experiment name Duration Management (a) Percent change Relative to conventional (C) or to start (S) SOC difference significant: yes (Y), no (N), unknown (U) Amount of manure in ‘org’ proportional to yields (P), external inputs (E), unknown (U) Sampling depth (cm) Same rotation yes (Y), no (N), unkown (U) Data from repeated samplings yes (Y), no (N) Applied amount of organic fertilizer in organic systems higher (H), lower (L), similar (S), unknown (U) SOC measured as concentration (C) or mass (M) Additional info
Results from plot experiments
Clark et al. (1998) SAFS 8 org 0.63 C N E 30 Y N H C
Drinkwater et al. (1998), Liebhardt et al. (1989), Wander et al. (1994), Pimentel et al. (2005) Rodale 14 con 0.44 S U 15 N Y M Con ‘referred’ to as ‘integrated’ in paper
Rodale 14 org 1.87 S Y U 15 N Y H M Bio with animals
Rodale 14 org 1.18 S Y P 15 N Y S M Bio without animals
Rodale 21 org 1.19 C Y U 30 N N H M Bio with animals
Rodale 21 org 0.95 C Y P 30 N N S M Bio without animals
Eltun et al. (2002), Breland and Eltun (1999) Kapp 7 con −2.86 S U 25 N Y C Arable
Kapp 7 org −1.48 S U U 25 N Y H C Arable
Kapp 7 con −1.59 S U 25 N Y C Forage
Kapp 7 org −2.47 S U U 25 N Y H C Forage
Fließbach et al. (2007) DOK 21 con 0.78 S N 20 Y Y C DOK: ‘conventional’ refers to integrated farming practice with manure in all cases
DOK 21 org 0.80 S N P 20 Y Y S C All DOK data taken from Fließbach et al. refer to lower fertilization level
DOK 21 dyn 0.70 S N P 20 Y Y S C
Friedel (2000) Ensmad 21 org 0.53 C N U 25 Y N H C
Kirchmann et al. (2007) Bärröd 19 con −1.20 S U 30 N Y C
Bärröd 19 org −0.41 S N E 30 N Y S C
Kong et al. (2005, 2007), Denison et al. (2004) LTRAS 10 con −0.06 S N 15 N Y M
LTRAS 10 org 3.26 S Y E 15 N Y H M
Kramer et al. (2006), Reganold et al. (2001), Glover et al. (2000) Washington state 9 org 5.83 C U E 7.5 Y N H C
Leifeld et al. (2009) DOK 27 con −0.48 S Y 20 Y Y M DOK: ‘conventional’ refers to integrated farming practice with manure in all cases
DOK 27 org −0.43 S Y P 20 Y Y S M All DOK data taken from Leifeld et al. refer to higher fertilization level
DOK 27 dyn −0.28 S N P 20 Y Y S M
Melero et al. (2006) Andalusia 5 con 1.41 S U 15 Y Y C
Andalusia 5 org 33.85 S Y E 15 Y Y H C
Andalusia 6 con 4.06 S U 15 Y Y C
Andalusia 6 org 30.13 S Y E 15 Y Y H C
Reeve et al. (2005) McNab 6 org −0.69 C N E 15 Y N C
McNab 6 dyn −0.69 C N E 15 Y N C
Robertson et al. (2000) Michigan 10 con 0.00 S N 7.5 N Y M
Michigan 10 org 0.85 S N P 7.5 N Y S M
Scheller and Raupp (2005), Raupp (2001) Darmstadt 1998 18 con −1.38 S Y 25 Y Y C Low
Darmstadt 1998 18 org −1.16 S Y P 25 Y Y H C Low; composted FYM without biodynamic prep. classified as ‘org’
Darmstadt 1998 18 dyn −0.53 S Y P 25 Y Y H C Low
Darmstadt 1998 18 con −1.38 S Y 25 Y Y C Medium
Darmstadt 1998 18 org −0.63 S Y P 25 Y Y H C Medium; composted FYM without biodynamic prep. classified as ‘org’
Darmstadt 1998 18 dyn −0.32 S Y P 25 Y Y H C Medium
Darmstadt 1998 18 con −1.32 S Y 25 Y Y C High
Darmstadt 1998 18 org −0.74 S Y E 25 Y Y H C High; composted FYM without biodynamic prep. classified as ‘org’
Darmstadt 1998 18 dyn 0.11 S Y E 25 Y Y H C High
Wells et al. (2000) New South Wales 3 con −0.28 S N 10 N Y C
New South Wales 3 dyn 18.49 S Y E 10 N Y H C
References consulted for experiment Experiment name Duration Management (a) Percent change Relative to conventional (C) or to start (S) SOC difference significant: yes (Y), no (N), unknown (U) Amount of manure in ‘org’ proportional to yields (P), external inputs (E), unknown (U) Sampling depth (cm) Same rotation yes (Y), no (N), unkown (U) Data from repeated samplings yes (Y), no (N) Applied amount of organic fertilizer in organic systems higher (H), lower (L), similar (S), unknown (U) SOC measured as concentration (C) or mass (M) Additional info
Results from farm-scale experiments
Blakemore (2000) Haughtey 41 org 1.88 C Y P 25 Y N S M Change relative to con mixed
Haughtey 41 org 2.02 C Y P 25 N N H M Change relative to con stockless
Gerhardt (1997) lowa 40 org 5.14 C Y U 10 N N H C
lowa 40 org −0.30 C N U 40 N N H M
Liebig and Doran (1999) Nebraska, North Dakota 9 org 0.46 C N U 30.5 N N H M
Nebraska, North Dakota 29 org 1.25 C Y P 30.5 N N S M
Nebraska, North Dakota 10 org 2.64 C Y U 30.5 N N U M
Nebraska, North Dakota 19 org 1.87 C Y U 30.5 N N H M
Nebraska, North Dakota 19 org 0.69 C N U 30.5 N N H M
Marinari et al. (2006) Colle Valle Agrinatura 7 org −0.61 C N U 35 N N H C
Nguyen et al. (1995) Canterbury 8 dyn 0.00 C U U 7.5 N N H C Kowai crop phase
Canterbury 8 dyn 1.52 C U U 7.5 N N H C Kowai pasture phase
Canterbury 8 org −0.39 C U U 7.5 N N H C Temuka crop phase
Canterbury 8 org 0.39 C U U 7.5 N N H C Temika pasture phase
Canterbury 8 org 0.46 C U U 7.5 N N S C Templeton crop phase
Canterbury 8 org 0.43 C U U 7.5 N N S C Templeton pasture phase
Pulleman et al. (2003), Droogers and Bouma (1996) Polder 70 dyn 0.80 C Y E 20 Y N H C Arable
Polder 70 dyn 0.03 C Y E 50 U N H M Arable
Polder 70 dyn 0.67 C N E 50 U N H M Ley
Reganold et al. (1993) New Zealand North Island 12 dyn 3.38 C Y U 10 Y N H C
New Zealand North Island 15 dyn 1.63 C Y E 10 Y N H C
New Zealand North Island 8 dyn 2.02 C Y E 10 Y N H C
New Zealand North Island 10 dyn −2.05 C N E 10 Y N H C
New Zealand North Island 13 dyn 2.16 C Y E 10 Y N U C
New Zealand North Island 24 dyn −0.42 C N E 10 Y N H C
New Zealand North Island 25 dyn 0.79 C Y U 10 Y N S C
Stamatiadis et al. (1996) Aegion 4 org 2.46 C N E 15 Y N H M

Results from plot experiments