Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun;17(6):990–999. doi: 10.3201/eid1706.101161

Table 7. Univariate and multivariate analysis of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 SAR infection for acute respiratory infection, by gender, age group and prophylaxis, United Kingdom, 2009*.

Variable
No. contacts†
No. secondary
case-patients
Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
SAR, % (95% CI)
p value‡
OR (95% CI)
p value
Sex, n = 704
M 339 56 16.5 (12.9–20.9) 1.0, baseline
F
365
64
17.5 (12.5–24)
0.72

1.9 (1.0–3.5)
0.04
Age, y
<16 194 49 25.3 (15.4–38.6) 7.0 (3.0–21.0)
16–49 359 56 15.6 (9.2–25.2) 3.6 (1.5–8.8)
>50
166
15
9.0 (5.5–14.4)
<0.001

1.0, baseline
0.001
Prophylaxis, n = 549
No 106 80 75.5 (66.4–82.7) 1, baseline
Yes
443
34
7.7 (4.5–12.7)
<0.001

0.02 (0.01–0.03)
<0.001
Primary case-patient treatment
>48 h 435 79 18.2 (14.8–22.1) 1, baseline
<48 h
284
41
14.4 (10.1–20.3)
0.019

1.7 (0.9–3.1)
0.11
Total 719 120 16.7 (14.1–19.6)

*n = 719 except as indicated. Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test for multivariate model, p = 0.392. SAR, secondary attack rate; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.
†Excludes coprimary case-patients.
‡Indicates overall p-value for differences by group.