Table 7.
MCI/NC classification comparison of our proposed method (iMSF) and missing value estimation methods (Zero, KNN, SVD and EM) in terms of accuracy, sensitivity and specificity when the training percentage varies from 1/2 to 3/4 as well as leave-one-out (LOO). In this experiment, we used the full multi-source data including MRI, PET, proteomics and CSF with 608 subjects in total.
Accuracy | Training Size | iMSF | Zero | EM | KNN | SVD |
50.0% | 0.8872 | 0.8346 | 0.8095 | 0.8142 | 0.8115 | |
66.7% | 0.9033 | 0.843 | 0.8132 | 0.8113 | 0.8193 | |
75.0% | 0.8927 | 0.8462 | 0.8088 | 0.8106 | 0.8165 | |
LOO | 0.9116 | 0.8481 | 0.8204 | 0.8287 | 0.8204 | |
Sensitivity | Training Size | iMSF | Zero | EM | KNN | SVD |
50.0% | 0.6228 | 0.2537 | 0.1573 | 0.174 | 0.1678 | |
66.7% | 0.6922 | 0.3055 | 0.1726 | 0.1768 | 0.2092 | |
75.0% | 0.7162 | 0.3184 | 0.1709 | 0.1741 | 0.2093 | |
LOO | 0.7375 | 0.3125 | 0.2125 | 0.2625 | 0.2 | |
Specificity | Training Size | iMSF | Zero | EM | KNN | SVD |
50.0% | 0.9907 | 0.9955 | 0.9901 | 0.9915 | 0.9898 | |
66.7% | 0.9934 | 0.9956 | 0.9931 | 0.9895 | 0.9906 | |
75.0% | 0.9949 | 0.9982 | 0.9907 | 0.9912 | 0.9893 | |
LOO | 0.9965 | 1 | 0.9929 | 0.9894 | 0.9965 |