Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 2.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2012 Mar 29;61(3):622–632. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.059

Table 7.

MCI/NC classification comparison of our proposed method (iMSF) and missing value estimation methods (Zero, KNN, SVD and EM) in terms of accuracy, sensitivity and specificity when the training percentage varies from 1/2 to 3/4 as well as leave-one-out (LOO). In this experiment, we used the full multi-source data including MRI, PET, proteomics and CSF with 608 subjects in total.

Accuracy Training Size iMSF Zero EM KNN SVD
50.0% 0.8872 0.8346 0.8095 0.8142 0.8115
66.7% 0.9033 0.843 0.8132 0.8113 0.8193
75.0% 0.8927 0.8462 0.8088 0.8106 0.8165
LOO 0.9116 0.8481 0.8204 0.8287 0.8204
Sensitivity Training Size iMSF Zero EM KNN SVD
50.0% 0.6228 0.2537 0.1573 0.174 0.1678
66.7% 0.6922 0.3055 0.1726 0.1768 0.2092
75.0% 0.7162 0.3184 0.1709 0.1741 0.2093
LOO 0.7375 0.3125 0.2125 0.2625 0.2
Specificity Training Size iMSF Zero EM KNN SVD
50.0% 0.9907 0.9955 0.9901 0.9915 0.9898
66.7% 0.9934 0.9956 0.9931 0.9895 0.9906
75.0% 0.9949 0.9982 0.9907 0.9912 0.9893
LOO 0.9965 1 0.9929 0.9894 0.9965
HHS Vulnerability Disclosure