Skip to main content
. 2012 May 14;2(3):e001087. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001087

Table 1.

Public attitudes in four countries about comparative effectiveness decision making and patient access (in per cent)

Germany (n=500), % (95% CI) Italy (n=500), % (95% CI) UK (n=500), % (95% CI) USA (n=1017), % (95% CI)
In (your country) the (government or health insurance plans withhold/national health service withholds) high-cost (prescription drugs/medical or surgical treatments) from people who might benefit in order to save money…
 Very often 15 (11 to 19) 19 (15 to 24) 11 (7 to 14) 29 (26 to 33)
 Somewhat often 43 (38 to 48) 36 (31 to 41) 28 (23 to 33) 38 (34 to 41)
 Not too often 30 (25 to 35) 25 (20 to 29) 39 (33 to 44) 20 (17 to 23)
 Not at all 4 (2 to 7) 9 (6 to 12) 19 (15 to 23) 7 (5 to 9)
 Don't know/refused 7 (4 to 10) 11 (8 to 14) 4 (1 to 6) 6 (4 to 8)
Paying for/providing approved (prescription drugs/medical or surgical treatments) regardless of cost (respondents were asked to choose between two statements:)
 The (government or health insurance plans should pay for/national health service should provide) any (prescription drug/medical or surgical treatment) that has been approved as being safe and effective for saving lives or improving people's health, regardless of what it costs 61 (56 to 66) 77 (72 to 81) 60 (55 to 65) 59 (55 to 62)
 There are so many new expensive prescription drugs and medical or surgical treatments that it is too expensive for (government or health insurance plans to pay for/the national health service to provide) all of them 35 (29 to 40) 20 (16 to 24) 38 (33 to 43) 35 (31 to 39)
The (government or your health insurance plan paying for/national health service providing) more expensive (prescription drug/medical or surgical treatment) recommended by your doctor even if it has not been shown to work better than less expensive (drugs/treatments)
 Favour paying for/providing (oppose comparative effectiveness) 43 (37 to 48) 21 (17 to 25) 29 (24 to 34) 33 (29 to 37)
 Oppose paying for/providing (favour comparative effectiveness) 49 (44 to 54) 70 (65 to 75) 69 (64 to 74) 64 (61 to 68)
Some (prescription drugs/medical or surgical treatments) that have been shown to be safe and effective should not be (paid for by the government or health insurance plans/provided by the national health service) because their high cost is not felt to be justified by the amount of benefit they provide
 Favour not paying for/providing 32 (27 to 37) 31 (26 to 36) 34 (28 to 39) 31 (27 to 34)
 Oppose not paying for/providing 59 (54 to 65) 61 (56 to 66) 63 (58 to 68) 62 (59 to 66)

Source: Harvard School of Public Health/Alliance for Aging Research Survey, 2011.

‘Don't know/refused’ responses not shown unless they are 10% or greater for the question in one or more countries.