Skip to main content
. 2012 May 14;2(3):e001087. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001087

Table 3.

Public attitudes in four countries about government decision-making about costs of medical interventions (in per cent)

Germany (n=500), % (95% CI) Italy (n=500), % (95% CI) UK (n=500), % (95% CI) USA (n=1017), % (95% CI)
Favour/oppose (your country) having a government decision-making body that recommends whether government programmes should pay for/provide (prescription drugs/medical or surgical treatments) if they think they cost too much
 Favour 71 (66 to 76) 69 (64 to 74) 46 (40 to 51) 43 (39 to 47)
 Oppose 21 (17 to 25) 23 (18 to 27) 48 (42 to 53) 54 (50 to 58)
Such a government decision-making body would provide doctors with useful scientific information about what works best for patients with a given disease or medical condition
 Yes 64 (59 to 69) 87 (84 to 90) 67 (62 to 73) 55 (51 to 59)
 No 27 (22 to 31) 7 (5 to 9) 27 (23 to 32) 40 (36 to 43)
Trust the national government to make the right healthcare decisions
 Trust 42 (37 to 47) 54 (49 to 59) 54 (49 to 59) 34 (30 to 38)
 Do not trust 53 (48 to 58) 35 (30 to 40) 39 (34 to 44) 61 (57 to 65)
 Don't know/refused 5 (3 to 7) 11 (8 to 14) 7 (4 to 10) 4 (3 to 5)

Source: Harvard School of Public Health/Alliance for Aging Research Survey, 2011.

‘Don't know/refused’ responses not shown unless they are 10% or greater for the question in one or more countries.