Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 15.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Biol. 2012 Apr 19;366(2):163–171. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2012.04.008

Table 1.

DAVID bioinformatics resources sorting of genes for each of the phenotypic classes

GO process term Enriched genes p1 value Bonferroni p value2 fold change
Synaptic Apposition (61 genes)
1 proteasome 17 out of 61 (27.9%) 0.00000 0.00000 22
2 mitotic spindle organization 14 out of 62 (23%) 0.00000 0.00000 8
3 chaperone 5 out of 61 (8.2%) 0.00410 0.25000 7.2
NMJ undergrowth (49 genes)
1 spindle organization 10 out of 49 (20.4%) 0.00002 0.01000 6
NMJ overgrowth (16 genes)
1 cell differentiation 8 out of 16 (50%) 0.00007 0.02000 5.3
Synaptic retractions (60 genes)
1 proteasome 6 out of 60 (10%) 0.00012 0.04500 8.5
2 mitotic spindle organization 8 out of 60 (13.3%) 0.00094 0.46000 4.7
3 Ribosome 4 out of 60 (6.7%) 0.00970 0.15000 7.9
Axonal transport (30 genes)
1 cytoskeletal part 6 out of 30 (20.0%) 0.00410 0.45000 5
1

The p value represents the confidence with which we can conclude that the GO term is overrepresented in each of the phenotypic class compared to the collection of the screened genes.

2

The p value is derived from a binomial distribution and the Bonferroni p value results from multiplying this p value by the number of tests performed.