Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 May 23.
Published in final edited form as: J Soc Social Work Res. 2012 Mar 23;3(2):65–79. doi: 10.5243/jsswr.2012.5

Table 4.

Network Composition and Treatment Stage Group

Engagement (n = 83) Persuasion (n = 111) Active Treatment (n = 48) F P
Partner 0.9(0.8) 0.8(0.8) 0.9(0.8) 1.126 .326
Family 9.9(5.6) 9.8(5.2) 9.4(4.6) .178 .837
Children 1.8(1.7) 2.0(1.9) 1.5(1.8) 1.215 .299
Treatment 1.9(3.1)a 2.4(3.4) 3.7(4.1)a 4.453 .013
Professional 1.3(1.8) 1.4(1.8) 1.4(2.0) .033 .967
Alcohol and other drug users 3.5(3.7) 3.9(3.7) 3.6(3.8) .217 .805
Used with 5.2(4.5) 5.8(4.2) 5.7(4.5) .558 .573

Note: Data are presented as mean (SD), df = 2/239.

a

Post-hoc test with Tukey’s honest significant difference; significant difference at .05 level