. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 May 23.

Published in final edited form as: J Soc Social Work Res. 2012 Mar 23;3(2):65–79. doi: 10.5243/jsswr.2012.5

Table 6.

Network Structure and Treatment Stage Group

	Engagement (n = 83)	Persuasion (n = 111)	Active Treatment (n = 48)	F	P
Density	0.3(0.3)	0.2(0.2)	0.3(0.2)	1.052	.351
Degree Ct	22.7(13.9)^a	29.8(16.9)^a	27.2(16.1)	4.755	.009
Between Ct	11.5(13.5)	14.3(14.6)	11.2(12.5)	1.359	.259
# of isolates	6.2(6.6)	4.9(5.1)	4.8(5.3)	1.606	.203
# of components	1.3(.8)^a	1.5(.8)	1.8(.9)^a	5.787	.004

Note. Data are presented as mean (SD), df = 2/239.

Post-hoc test with Tukey’s honest significant difference; significant difference at .05 level Ct = Centralization