Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 May 23.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2007 Apr 18;36(4):1074–1085. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.011

Table 3.

Parcellation Results: Comparison of Volumes and Surfaces of the Parcellated ICC

Parcellated Region Preterm Infants Fullterm Infants p-Value
Volumes
ICC superior 329.0 ± 39.1 305.3 ± 35.5 0.0084
ICC inferior 170.2 ± 21.1 172.6 ± 17.9 0.6625
Frontal region 82.9 ± 12.7 68.9 ± 11.6 0.0002
Precentral region 80.8 ± 12.1 82.8 ± 10.5 0.5063
Central region 99.7 ± 10.8 101.3 ± 9.6 0.5571
Occipital region 235.9 ± 28.0 225.0 ± 27.4 0.0829
Superior frontal region 55.4 ± 9.1 41.1 ± 7.5 0.0000
Inferior frontal region 27.5 ± 4.6 27.8 ± 5.6 0.8235
Surfaces
ICC total 354.5 ± 29.0 344.6 ± 24.8 0.1198
ICC superior 278.8 ± 22.8 268.6 ± 19.0 0.0364
ICC inferior 237.6 ± 20.8 237.9 ± 15.2 0.9993
Frontal region 119.8 ± 11.6 109.6 ± 12.2 0.0033
Precentral region 148.2 ± 13.2 149.7 ± 12.0 0.6797
Central region 170.2 ± 13.3 172.5 ± 13.3 0.5463
Occipital region 227.4 ± 19.3 223.2 ± 18.7 0.3236
Superior frontal region 94.7 ± 9.8 82.3 ± 9.5 0.0001
Inferior frontal region 62.4 ± 6.4 61.9 ± 7.1 0.7460

Volumes (unit: milliliter) and Surfaces (unit: centimeter squared) were analyzed for differences between preterm (n = 24) and fullterm infants (n = 20) using ANCOVA. Results are given as mean ± standard deviation. p-Values are considered significant when printed in bold. ICC = intra-cranial cavity.