Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 May 23.
Published in final edited form as: J Educ Psychol Consult. 2011 Nov 11;21(4):259–283. doi: 10.1080/10474412.2011.620818

TABLE 4.

Intercorrelations for Child Goal Attainment Outcome Scores, IEP Quality, Proportion of Speech Exchanges Within Triads, Parent and Teacher Satisfaction Ratings, and Adherence to Protocol Ratings (n = 17)

Variable 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
1. GAS score .21 .22 .21 .29 .56 .46 .47 .07 .41 .31
2. Affiliative .22 .11 <.001 .21 .74 .38 .35 .24 .31 .32
3. Distancing −.02 −.63* .13 .22 .79 .26 .21 .18 .44 .26
4. Mixed −.22 −.99* .57* .23 .68 .41 .36 .24 .30 .32
5. IEP quality −.14 .51* −.49* −.49* .29 .30 .34 .26 .39 .47
6. Adherence 1 −.29 .19 −.63 −.28 .73* .56 .58 .76 .56 .38
7. Adherence 2 .27 −.27 .21 .26 .07 .50 .29 .19 .30 .31
8. Adherence 3 .27 −.43 .58* .39 −.39 −.27 3.07 .28 .17 .35
9. Adherence 4 .91* −.13 .33 .12 −.37 −.22 .71* .43 .34 .29
10. Teacher satisfaction .12 −.07 .33 .06 .27 −.10 .21 .65* .19 .26
11. Parent satisfaction −.04 .31 −.30 −.33 .06 .40 −.15 .21 −.18 .36

Note. Correlations are in the lower diagonal; standard errors (SEs) are in the upper diagonal. Correlations were calculated using the weighted least-squares with mean and variance adjustment (WLSMV) estimator in Mplus 6.1. GAS = goal attainment scaling score at data end of school year; Affiliative = affiliative speech exchanges; Distancing = distancing speech exchanges; Mixed = mixed speech exchanges; IEP quality = IEP quality following COMPASS consultation; Adherence = teacher fidelity of implementation of COMPASS teaching plan at a coaching session.

*

p < .05, two-tailed or |z| ≥ 1.96 based on using a unit normal test where z = r/SE WLSM.