Table 4.
Assessment by the 2010 sample of achievement of study goals
| Items: 'The IPL-IPP study has...' |
% of staff responding | Assessment index | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strongly agree/ Agree |
Neutral | Strongly disagree/disagree | (% agree - % disagree) | Rank* | |
| 1. Improved communication between members of different professions | 30.8% | 56.2% | 13.0% | 17.8% | 9 |
| 2. Improved trust between members of different professions | 29.8% | 58.7% | 11.4% | 18.4% | 8 |
| 3. Helped individuals improve communication skills | 35.0% | 55.6% | 9.3% | 25.7% | 4 |
| 4. Reduced between-professional rivalries | 20.8% | 65.4% | 13.8% | 7.0% | 10 |
| 5. Resulted in better relationships between members of different professions | 31.4% | 59.3% | 9.4% | 22.0% | 6 |
| 6. Resulted in more positive attitudes to team work | 37.0% | 53.8% | 9.1% | 27.9% | 3 |
|
7. Led to sharing of knowledge/ ideas between members of different professions |
39.4% | 51.0% | 9.6% | 29.8% | 1 |
| 8. Led to more creative, integrated services | 31.6% | 57.8% | 10.7% | 20.9% | 7 |
| 9. Improved clinical practice between members of different professions | 33.3% | 57.2% | 9.4% | 23.9% | 5 |
| 10. Improved quality of care for patients | 37.3% | 53.7% | 9.0% | 28.3% | 2 |
| Average | 32.5% | 56.9% | 10.5% | ||
*Responses ranked from 1 most to 10 least achieved